The DOI matches its Crossref record; 110 of the 110 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ideas, institutions, and policy change
Abstract
Seeking to amend historical institutionalism, this article draws on the political science literature on ideas and the sociological literature on framing to discuss three ways in which ideational processes impact policy change. First, such processes help to construct the problems and issues that enter the policy agenda. Second, ideational processes shape the assumptions that affect the content of reform proposals. Third, these processes can become discursive weapons that participate in the construction of reform imperatives. Overall, ideational processes impact the ways policy actors perceive their interests and the environment in which they mobilize. Yet, such processes are not the only catalyst of policy change, and institutional constraints impact the politics of ideas and policy change. This claim is further articulated in the final section, which shows how national institutions and repertoires remain central to the politics of policy change despite the undeniable role of transnational actors and processes, which interact with such institutions and repertoires.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Social Construction of Reality
Rose, D. M., Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/323448 · Cited by 13,820
Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies
Perry, J., & Kingdon, J. W. (1985) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.2307/3323801 · Cited by 11,225
Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment
Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611 · Cited by 9,953
Agendas, alternatives, and public policies
Kingdon, J. W. (1984) · Cited by 9,299
Social Theory of International Politics
Wendt, A. (1999) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511612183 · Cited by 7,664
Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain
Hall, P. A. (1993) · Comparative Politics · doi:10.2307/422246 · Cited by 7,369
Harvey, D. (2003) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199264315.001.0001 · Cited by 7,037
Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms
Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. R. (1996) · Political Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x · Cited by 6,796
Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation
Snow, D. A., Rochford, E. B., Worden, S. K., & Benford, R. D. (1986) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095581 · Cited by 6,548
Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis
Pierson, P. (2004) · doi:10.1515/9781400841080 · Cited by 4,957
Cited by
The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis
Wildavsky, A. (1979) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-04955-4 · Cited by 896
Speaking of change: why discourse is key to the dynamics of policy transformation
Schmidt, V. A. (2011) · Critical Policy Studies · doi:10.1080/19460171.2011.576520 · Cited by 317
Paradigm man vs. the bricoleur: bricolage as an alternative vision of agency in ideational change
Carstensen, M. B. (2011) · European Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s1755773910000342 · Cited by 316
Powerful rules governing the euro: the perverse logic of German ideas
Matthijs, M. (2016) · Journal of European Public Policy · doi:10.1080/13501763.2015.1115535 · Cited by 293
When Populist Leaders Govern: Conceptualising Populism in Policy Making
Bartha, A., Boda, Z., & Szikra, D. (2020) · Politics and Governance · doi:10.17645/pag.v8i3.2922 · Cited by 148
Metadata
- Authors
- Béland, D.
- Venue
- Journal of European Public Policy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-08
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 701-718
- ISSN
- 1350-1763 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-4429
- OpenAlex
- W2170871477
- Cited by
- 629
- References
- 110
- FWCI
- 106.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ideas, institutions, and policy change. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13501760902983382
- The paper
- Béland, D. (2009). Ideas, institutions, and policy change. Journal of European Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760902983382
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.