The DOI matches its Crossref record; 105 of the 105 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Speaking of change: why discourse is key to the dynamics of policy transformation
Abstract
This article maps out the field of study known as discursive institutionalism while exploring the range of ways in which scholars in this field explain the dynamics of change (and continuity). In so doing, it examines theoretical issues related to the timing of change, including crisis-driven or incremental approaches to change in policy, programmatic, and philosophical ideas; the content of change not only in different levels of ideas but also in different types, cognitive and normative, and in different forms of discourse; the processes of change via ‘sentient’ agents in different discursive spheres, whether the coordinative discourse of policy actors or the communicative discourse of political actors with the public; and the context of change, not only the meaning context of ideas and the forum for discourse but also the formal and informal institutional structures that are the focus of rationalist, historical and sociological institutional approaches. The article seeks to demonstrate that only by understanding discourse as substantive ideas and interactive processes in institutional context can we fully demonstrate its transformational role in policy change. Speaking of change, in other words, rather than just thinking it, is key to explaining the actions that lead to major policy transformations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Kuhn, T. S., & Schlegel, R. (1963) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3050879 · Cited by 35,538
Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies
Perry, J., & Kingdon, J. W. (1985) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.2307/3323801 · Cited by 11,225
Selections from the prison notebooks
Gramsci, A. (2020) · The Applied Theatre Reader · doi:10.4324/9780429355363-27 · Cited by 9,750
Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics
Mouffe, C., & Laclau, E. (1985) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 9,303
Agendas, alternatives, and public policies
Kingdon, J. W. (1984) · Cited by 9,299
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.
Bohm, D., & Kuhn, T. S. (1964) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2217783 · Cited by 9,130
Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies
Swidler, A. (1986) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095521 · Cited by 8,661
Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics
Pierson, P. (2000) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2586011 · Cited by 8,094 · cited 2×
“Vol. 5, No. 2, July 2011, 106–126 Speaking of change: why discourse is key to the dynamics of policy transformation Vivien A. Schmidt∗”
BackgroundThe Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion
Zaller, J. R. (1992) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511818691 · Cited by 7,785
Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination
Haas, P. M. (1992) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818300001442 · Cited by 7,584
Cited by
Exploring curriculum change using discursive institutionalism – a conceptual framework
Nordin, A., & Sundberg, D. (2018) · Journal of Curriculum Studies · doi:10.1080/00220272.2018.1482961 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmidt, V. A.
- Venue
- Critical Policy Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-07
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 106-126
- ISSN
- 1946-0171 (ISSN-L)
- 1946-018X
- OpenAlex
- W2015266016
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 105
- FWCI
- 62.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Speaking of change: why discourse is key to the dynamics of policy transformation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/19460171.2011.576520
- The paper
- Schmidt, V. A. (2011). Speaking of change: why discourse is key to the dynamics of policy transformation. Critical Policy Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2011.576520
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.