Cited by 117Interdisciplinary Research and CollaborationSustainability and Climate Change GovernanceResearch, Science, and Academia

The Normative Dimension in Transdisciplinarity, Transition Management, and Transformation Sciences: New Roles of Science and Universities in Sustainable Transitioning

Open access
Scholz, Roland·2017·Sustainability

Abstract

This paper discusses the role normative aspects play in different approaches of science–practice collaboration, in particular as action research, (Mode 2) Transdisciplinarity (Td), Transition Management (TM), and Transformative Science (TSc). We elaborate on the different roles that scientists in these processes play. They work as facilitators (or contribute to a facilitated Td process), as activists (i.e., activist researchers) in TM projects, and as catalysts in TSc. Td processes develop socially robust solutions for sustainable transitioning and impacts on the science system through mutual learning and by integrating epistemics (i.e., ways of knowing) from science and practice and focusing on the empowerment of stakeholders. Science is viewed as a public good aiming to serve all key stakeholders. Researchers involved in TM projects strive to influence ongoing transition processes by actively engaging and participating in them, including lobbying for and empowering transformative changes toward sustainability based upon the researchers’ own analyses and world views. The TSc approach takes a catalyst perspective of the scientist’s role in inducing processes of strategic (societal) transition when including certain stakeholder groups. The paper focuses on what roles normative aspects play in the different approaches and new societal demands imposed on science and universities. Based on this, we conclude that a new order of universities, public knowledge institutions, and boundary institutions is forthcoming.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su9060991

Cites

110 of 110 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Bernal, J.D. Science in History; Penguin: Hammondsworth, UK, 1965.
  2. United Nations (UN). Agenda 21. Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development Annex I and II; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 1992.
  3. Scholz, R.W.; Le, Q.L. A novice's guide to transdisciplinarity. In Sustainable Phosphorus Management: A Global Transdisciplinary Roadmap; Scholz, R.W., Roy, A.H., Brand, F.S., Hellums, D.T., Ulrich, A.E., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; pp. 118-122.
  4. Klein, J.T., Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W., Häberli, R., Bill, A., Scholz, R.W., Welti, M., Eds.; Birkhäuser Verlag AG: Basel, Switzerland, 2001; pp. 236-252.
  5. Lewin, K., Ed.; American Psychological Association: Washington, DC, USA, 1946; pp. 337-381.
  6. Scholz, R.W., Bösch, S., Stauffacher, M., Oswald, J.E., Eds.; Rüegger: Zurich, Switzerland, 2001; pp. 243-254.
  7. Whyte, W.F., Ed.; Sage: Newbury Park, CA, USA, 1991; pp. 85-96.
  8. Rotmans, J.; Denelzen, M.G.J.; Krol, M.S.; Swart, R.J.; Vanderwoerd, H.J. Stabilizing atmospheric concentrations-towards international methane control. Ambio 1992, 21, 404-413.
  9. Rio Declaration. Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development; United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA): Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1992.
  10. Mintzer, I.M.; Leonard, J.A. Negotiating Climate Change: The Inside Story of the Rio Convention; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1994.
  11. Pearce, D.W.; Turner, R.K. Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment; John Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD, USA, 1990.
  12. Daly, H.E. Operationalizing sustainable development by investing in natural capital. In Investing in Natural Capital: The Ecological Economics Approach to Sustainability; Jannsson, A., Hammer, H., Folke, C., Costanza, R., Eds.; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1994; pp. 21-37.
  13. Schneidewind, U. Transformative Literacy: Gesellschaftliche Veränderungsprozesse verstehen und gestalten. GAIA Ecol. Perspect. Sci. Soc. 2013, 22, 82-86.
  14. Schneidewind, U.; Ernst, A.; Lang, D.J. Institutions for transformative research. the formation of the nawis alliance. GAIA-Ecol. Perspect. Sci. Soc. 2011, 20, 133-135.
  15. Merton, R.K. Science and democratic social structure. In Social Theory and Social Structure; Free Press: Scotland, UK, 1957. 147. Gödel, K. Über formal unterscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme I. Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik 1931, 38, 173-198. [CrossRef] 148. Huff, D. How to Lie with Statistics; Norton: New York, NY, USA, 1954. 149. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Ravetz, J.R., Funtowicz, S., Benessia, A., Eds.; Consortium for Science, Policy & Outcomes: Arizona State University: Tempe, AZ, USA, 2015; pp. 1-30. 152.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scholz, R.
Affiliations
Universität für Weiterbildung Krems (AT)
Corresponding author
Scholz, Roland
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2017-06-09
Volume
9
Issue
6
Pages
991
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2622569585
Cited by
117
References
110
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 3
FWCI
18.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection (cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Research, Science, and Academia
Keywords
normativity, transdisciplinarity, transition management, transformative science, science-practice collaboration, role of scientists, sustainability transitions, stakeholder empowerment, mutual learning, universities, Mode 2 knowledge production

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review