Cited by 67Names, Identity, and Discrimination ResearchExperimental Behavioral Economics StudiesSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Revealing taste-based discrimination in hiring: a correspondence testing experiment with geographic variation

Carlsson, Magnus, Rooth, Dan-Olof·2012·Applied Economics Letters

Abstract

The standard Correspondence Testing Experiment (CTE) does not identify whether employer prejudice, as opposed to statistical discrimination, drives discriminatory behaviour when hiring. This article proposes a new methodology using geographic variation to explore the link between employer attitudes towards ethnic minorities and the ethnic difference in callbacks for a job interview. Using already existing Swedish data we find that a randomly selected employer is more likely to discriminate against a minority job applicant in regions where the average employer has more negative attitudes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13504851.2012.667537

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Carlsson & Rooth (2012) found greater discrimination against Arab applicants in regions of Sweden with more negative attitudes toward immigrants on a population survey.

    “First, Carlsson & Rooth (2012) find greater discrimination against Arab applicants in a field experiment in regions of Sweden with more negative attitudes toward immigrants on a population survey.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Carlsson, M., & Rooth, D.-O.
Affiliations
Linnaeus University (SE)
Corresponding author
Carlsson, Magnus
Venue
Applied Economics Letters
Published
2012-12
Volume
19
Issue
18
Pages
1861-1864
ISSN
  • 1350-4851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-4291
OpenAlex
W2158734636
Cited by
67
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
11.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Economics Letters (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Forskningsrådet för Arbetsliv och Socialvetenskap
  • Linnéuniversitetet
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
taste discrimination, employer prejudice, statistical discrimination, callbacks, job interviews, ethnic minorities, regional variation, employer perceptions, hiring discrimination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review