The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantifying the contribution of low-level saliency to human eye movements in dynamic scenes
Abstract
We investigated the contribution of low-level saliency to human eye movements in complex dynamic scenes. Eye movements were recorded while naive observers viewed a heterogeneous collection of 50 video clips (46,489 frames; 4-6 subjects per clip), yielding 11,916 saccades of amplitude ≥2°. A model of bottom-up visual attention computed instantaneous saliency at the instant each saccade started and at its future endpoint location. Median model-predicted saliency was 45% the maximum saliency, a significant factor 2.03 greater than expected by chance. Motion and temporal change were stronger predictors of human saccades than colour, intensity, or orientation features, with the best predictor being the sum of all features. There was no significant correlation between model-predicted saliency and duration of fixation. A majority of saccades were directed to a minority of locations reliably marked as salient by the model, suggesting that bottom-up saliency may provide a set of candidate saccade target locations, with the final choice of which location of fixate more strongly determined top-down.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1962) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837 · Cited by 13,680
Computational modelling of visual attention
Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35058500 · Cited by 4,733
Self-citationSelective Attention Gates Visual Processing in the Extrastriate Cortex
Moran, J., & Desimone, R. (1985) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.4023713 · Cited by 2,433
Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search.
Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. L. (1989) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.15.3.419 · Cited by 2,147
Attentional modulation of visual motion processing in cortical areas MT and MST
Treue, S., & Maunsell, J. H. R. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/382539a0 · Cited by 1,025
Cited by
Eye guidance in natural vision: reinterpreting salience
Tatler, B. W., Hayhoe, M. M., Land, M. F., & Ballard, D. H. (2011) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/11.5.5 · Cited by 775
Task and context determine where you look
Rothkopf, C. A., Ballard, D. H., & Hayhoe, M. M. (2016) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/7.14.16 · Cited by 366
Understanding Low- and High-Level Contributions to Fixation Prediction
Kummerer, M., Wallis, T. S. A., Gatys, L. A., & Bethge, M. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.513 · Cited by 282
Revisiting Video Saliency: A Large-Scale Benchmark and a New Model
Wang, W., Shen, J., Guo, F., Cheng, M.-M., & Borji, A. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00514 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Itti, L.
- Venue
- Visual Cognition
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-08
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1093-1123
- ISSN
- 1350-6285 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0716
- OpenAlex
- W1985904252
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 17.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantifying the contribution of low-level saliency to human eye movements in dynamic scenes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13506280444000661
- The paper
- Itti, L. (2005). Quantifying the contribution of low-level saliency to human eye movements in dynamic scenes. Visual Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280444000661
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.