Cited by 775Visual Attention and Saliency DetectionVisual perception and processing mechanismsGaze Tracking and Assistive Technology

Eye guidance in natural vision: reinterpreting salience

Open access
Tatler, B. W., Hayhoe, M. M., Land, M. F., Ballard, D. H.·2011·Journal of Vision

Abstract

Models of gaze allocation in complex scenes are derived mainly from studies of static picture viewing. The dominant framework to emerge has been image salience, where properties of the stimulus play a crucial role in guiding the eyes. However, salience-based schemes are poor at accounting for many aspects of picture viewing and can fail dramatically in the context of natural task performance. These failures have led to the development of new models of gaze allocation in scene viewing that address a number of these issues. However, models based on the picture-viewing paradigm are unlikely to generalize to a broader range of experimental contexts, because the stimulus context is limited, and the dynamic, task-driven nature of vision is not represented. We argue that there is a need to move away from this class of model and find the principles that govern gaze allocation in a broader range of settings. We outline the major limitations of salience-based selection schemes and highlight what we have learned from studies of gaze allocation in natural vision. Clear principles of selection are found across many instances of natural vision and these are not the principles that might be expected from picture-viewing studies. We discuss the emerging theoretical framework for gaze allocation on the basis of reward maximization and uncertainty reduction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1167/11.5.5

Cites

159 of 159 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When deployed in the service of a task, eye movements may be explained by the simple imperative to sample information in order to reduce uncertainty regarding future states.

    “Converging evidence suggests that, when deployed in the service of a task, eye movements may be explained by the simple imperative to sample information in order to reduce uncertainty regarding future states”

    From Information-seeking, curiosity, and attention: computational and neural mechanisms (2013) · cites this paper as Tatler, Hayhoe et al. 2011

  • Computational studies of naturalistic behaviors show that acquiring information may have material value, as it increases the chances of success of the subject's future actions.

    “Computational studies of naturalistic behaviors show that the act of acquiring information – whether it is overt or remains internal to the brain - may indeed have material value, as it increases the changes of success of the subject’s future actions (Tatler et al., 2011).”

    From Attention, learning, and the value of information (2012) · cites this paper as Tatler et al., 2011

  • The processes required to compute information value differ markedly from those considered in decision tasks.

    “However these studies also show that the processes required to compute information value differ markedly from those that have been so far considered in decision tasks.”

    From Attention, learning, and the value of information (2012) · cites this paper as Tatler et al., 2011

  • Studies of eye movements in natural behaviors attempt to estimate the material value that an eye movement may bring.

    “Rather than looking for an “intrinsic” preference for information, studies of eye movements in natural behaviors have adopted a more pragmatic approach and attempt to estimate the material value that an eye movement may bring (Hayhoe and Ballard, 2005; Tatler et al., 2011).”

    From Attention, learning, and the value of information (2012) · cites this paper as Tatler et al., 2011

  • Practically all eye movements made in naturalistic goal-directed behaviors can be interpreted as acquiring information to guide a forthcoming action.

    “Quantitative studies show that practically all the eye movements made in naturalistic goal-directed behaviors can be interpreted as acquiring information to guide a forthcoming action (Tatler et al., 2011).”

    From Attention, learning, and the value of information (2012) · cites this paper as Tatler et al., 2011

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Gajewski DA Pearson AM Mack ML Bartlett FN Henderson JM Paletta L Tsotsos JK Rome E Humphreys GW Human gaze control in real world search Attention and performance in computational vision 2005 83 99 Springer-Verlag Heidelberg, Germany
  2. Henderson JM Senior C Russell T Gazzaniga M Eye movements Methods in mind 2006 171 191 MIT Press Cambridge, MA
  3. Lee SP Badler JB Badler NI Eyes alive ACM Transactions on Graphics 2002 21 637 644
  4. Tatler BW Eye guidance and natural scenes 2009 Psychology Press Hove, UK

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tatler, B. W., Hayhoe, M. M., Land, M. F., & Ballard, D. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Dundee (GB)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • University of Sussex (GB)
Venue
Journal of Vision
Published
2011-05-27
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
5-5
ISSN
1534-7362 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081913479
Cited by
775
References
159
Citations by year
2026: 47 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 80 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 61 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 60 · 2014: 72 · 2013: 59 · 2012: 38
FWCI
59.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Vision (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Eye Institute (R01-EY05729, R01EY019174, R01EY005729)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
Keywords
gaze allocation, eye guidance, natural vision, reward maximization, uncertainty reduction, scene viewing, visual attention
MeSH terms
Attention, Behavior, Eye Movements, Fixation, Ocular, Humans, Learning, Models, Psychological, Photic Stimulation, Reward, Saccades, Time Factors, Vision, Ocular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review