The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Can I see your passport please? Perceptual discrimination of own-and other-race faces
Abstract
Psychological research has consistently demonstrated that individuals are better at discriminating faces of their own race when compared with faces of another, less familiar race. Given the racial/ethnic diversity of individuals screened by security personnel at transportation and border checkpoints, it is important to understand whether the cross-race effect may play a role in simultaneous perceptual discrimination tasks that mimic such screening operations. Three experiments assessed the deleterious effects of cross-racial identification in this context. Results demonstrated greater discrimination accuracy for own- versus other-race faces, and a propensity for screeners to be overconfident in their decisions, particularly for other-race persons. Further, perceived age differences between the target and his identification photo and the use of a disguise were found to moderate cross-race effects during this task.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
An own-race bias is present in both face recognition and matching tasks.
“evidence has shown that an own-race bias is present in both face recognition (Meissner & Brigham, 2001) and matching tasks (Megreya, White & Burton, 2011; Meissner, Susa & Ross, 2013)”
From Unfamiliar face matching with photographs of infants and children (2018) · cites this paper as Meissner, Susa & Ross, 2013
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 33
- 10.1080/13506285.2013.821428 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1012840831846 · DOI
- Brigham, J. C., Bennett, L., Meissner, C. A. & Mitchell, T. (2007).The influence of race on eyewitness memory. The handbook of eyewitness psychology: Vol II. Memory for people(pp. 257–281). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.02.007 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.1995.0021 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-9280.00144 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1068/p5360 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0364-0213(02)00084-8 · DOI
- 10.1348/000712607X199981 · DOI
- 10.1080/13506285.2013.824530 · DOI
- 10.1080/13506285.2013.821429 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0020463 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00028-4 · DOI
- 10.1037/0278-7393.22.5.1304 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199706)11:3<211::AID-ACP430>3.0.CO;2-O · DOI
- Krug K., 2007, Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 3, 7
- 10.1037/0021-9010.76.4.587 · DOI
- 10.1080/13506280903178622 · DOI
- 10.3758/PBR.16.1.99 · DOI
- 10.1080/17470218.2011.575228 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/1076-8971.7.1.3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/acp.1097 · DOI
- 10.1080/13506285.2013.803505 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.504 · DOI
- 10.1080/13506285.2012.654624 · DOI
- 10.1037/1076-8971.7.1.170 · DOI
- 10.1177/0022022107302310 · DOI
- 10.1521/soco.2010.28.4.523 · DOI
- 10.1080/13506285.2013.826315 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02686820 · DOI
- 10.1002/acp.1191 · DOI
- 10.1068/p5098 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.490 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Unfamiliar face matching with photographs of infants and children
Kramer, R. S. S., Mulgrew, J., & Reynolds, M. G. (2018) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.5010 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Meissner, C. A., Susa, K. J., & Ross, A. B.
- Venue
- Visual Cognition
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-09
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 9-10
- Pages
- 1287-1305
- ISSN
- 1350-6285
- 1464-0716
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review