Negative partisanship towards the populist radical right and democratic resilience in Western Europe
Abstract
Democracy is under threat today and scholars agree that the main challenge is not sudden regime breakdown, but rather the gradual erosion of key institutions and norms because of growing public support to political forces with illiberal tendencies. In the case of Western Europe, the major threat comes from the populist radical right. Although it is true that the latter has been gaining votes in Western Europe, scholars have not analysed the extent to which a sizeable share of the electorate dislikes this party family. Nevertheless, recent studies reveal that it is important to consider both those who feel close to and those who reject political parties, i.e. positive and negative partisanship. To address this research gap, in this contribution we rely on original survey data for 10 Western European countries to examine negative partisanship towards the populist radical right. The empirical analysis reveals that a large section of the Western European electorate has an aversion to this party family and this finding should be seen as an important sign of democratic resilience. In fact, those who dislike the populist radical right are strong supporters of both democracy per se and the liberal democratic regime.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Populist Radical-Right party family has the highest number of negative identifiers in Western Europe.
“Indeed, Meléndez and Kaltwasser (2021) have recently shown that the Populist Radical-Right party family has the highest number of negative identifiers in Western Europe.”
From Them’ without ‘us’: Negative identities and affective polarization in Brazil (2022) · cites this paper as Meléndez and Kaltwasser (2021)
Bolsonaro's extreme policies and rash populist rhetoric can foster a need for distinctiveness even amongst voters who did not particularly like the PT or the political left.
“Bolsonaro's extreme policies and rash populist rhetoric can foster a need for distinctiveness even amongst voters who did not particularly like the PT or the political left (and thus lack any clear in-group).”
From Them’ without ‘us’: Negative identities and affective polarization in Brazil (2022) · cites this paper as Meléndez and Kaltwasser (2021)
The rise of negative partisanship in Western Europe and the United States suggests negative partisanship can exert independent effects on political behaviour even in more established, high-partisan polities.
“Further, the rise of negative partisanship in Western Europe (Meléndez and Kaltwasser 2021) and the United States (Abramowitz and Webster 2016) suggests negative partisanship can exert independent effects on political behaviour even in more established, high-partisan polities.”
From Them’ without ‘us’: Negative identities and affective polarization in Brazil (2022) · cites this paper as Meléndez and Kaltwasser 2021
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323 · Cited by 7,678 · see citing works
The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States
Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. J. (2019) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034 · Cited by 3,317 · see citing works
The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean
Wodak, R. (2015) · doi:10.4135/9781446270073 · Cited by 1,925 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Polarisation, identity and affect - conceptualising affective polarisation in multi-party systems
Röllicke, L. (2023) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102655 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Them’ without ‘us’: Negative identities and affective polarization in Brazil
Areal, J. (2022) · Political Research Exchange · doi:10.1080/2474736x.2022.2117635 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
- Authors
- Meléndez, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R.
- Affiliations
- Universidad Diego Portales (CL)
- Corresponding author
- Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira
- Venue
- Democratization
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2021-03-29
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 949-969
- ISSN
- 1351-0347 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-890X
- OpenAlex
- W3141454942
- Cited by
- 95
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 5
- FWCI
- 44.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Democratization (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Centre for Social Conflict and Cohesion Studies (CONICYT/FONDAP/151330009, ANID / FONDAP / 15130009)
- Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico (1180020)
- The Observatory of Socioeconomic Transformations (ANID / PCI / Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies / MPG190012)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Keywords
- negative partisanship, populist radical right, democratic resilience, illiberalism, democratic backsliding, support for democracy, liberal democracy, Western Europe
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review