Cited by 95Populism, Right-Wing MovementsElectoral Systems and Political ParticipationPolitical Theory and Democracy

Negative partisanship towards the populist radical right and democratic resilience in Western Europe

Meléndez, Carlos, Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira·2021·Democratization

Abstract

Democracy is under threat today and scholars agree that the main challenge is not sudden regime breakdown, but rather the gradual erosion of key institutions and norms because of growing public support to political forces with illiberal tendencies. In the case of Western Europe, the major threat comes from the populist radical right. Although it is true that the latter has been gaining votes in Western Europe, scholars have not analysed the extent to which a sizeable share of the electorate dislikes this party family. Nevertheless, recent studies reveal that it is important to consider both those who feel close to and those who reject political parties, i.e. positive and negative partisanship. To address this research gap, in this contribution we rely on original survey data for 10 Western European countries to examine negative partisanship towards the populist radical right. The empirical analysis reveals that a large section of the Western European electorate has an aversion to this party family and this finding should be seen as an important sign of democratic resilience. In fact, those who dislike the populist radical right are strong supporters of both democracy per se and the liberal democratic regime.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13510347.2021.1883002

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Populist Radical-Right party family has the highest number of negative identifiers in Western Europe.

    “Indeed, Meléndez and Kaltwasser (2021) have recently shown that the Populist Radical-Right party family has the highest number of negative identifiers in Western Europe.”

    From Them’ without ‘us’: Negative identities and affective polarization in Brazil (2022) · cites this paper as Meléndez and Kaltwasser (2021)

  • Bolsonaro's extreme policies and rash populist rhetoric can foster a need for distinctiveness even amongst voters who did not particularly like the PT or the political left.

    “Bolsonaro's extreme policies and rash populist rhetoric can foster a need for distinctiveness even amongst voters who did not particularly like the PT or the political left (and thus lack any clear in-group).”

    From Them’ without ‘us’: Negative identities and affective polarization in Brazil (2022) · cites this paper as Meléndez and Kaltwasser (2021)

  • The rise of negative partisanship in Western Europe and the United States suggests negative partisanship can exert independent effects on political behaviour even in more established, high-partisan polities.

    “Further, the rise of negative partisanship in Western Europe (Meléndez and Kaltwasser 2021) and the United States (Abramowitz and Webster 2016) suggests negative partisanship can exert independent effects on political behaviour even in more established, high-partisan polities.”

    From Them’ without ‘us’: Negative identities and affective polarization in Brazil (2022) · cites this paper as Meléndez and Kaltwasser 2021

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Meléndez, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R.
Affiliations
Universidad Diego Portales (CL)
Corresponding author
Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira
Venue
Democratization
Published
2021-03-29
Volume
28
Issue
5
Pages
949-969
ISSN
  • 1351-0347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-890X
OpenAlex
W3141454942
Cited by
95
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 5
FWCI
44.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Democratization (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Centre for Social Conflict and Cohesion Studies (CONICYT/FONDAP/151330009, ANID / FONDAP / 15130009)
  • Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico (1180020)
  • The Observatory of Socioeconomic Transformations (ANID / PCI / Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies / MPG190012)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
Keywords
negative partisanship, populist radical right, democratic resilience, illiberalism, democratic backsliding, support for democracy, liberal democracy, Western Europe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review