The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The politics of community heritage: motivations, authority and control
Abstract
The community and heritage connection is one that is almost considered so natural an affinity it hardly needs justification or explanation. This paper looks critically at how community and heritage are understood and what arises when the two are brought together. Through the consideration of examples in Northern Ireland, the meaning of such engagement is explored with emphasis on motivations, issues of authority and the value of community‐heritage engagement as a means of control.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Membership of a community based on geographical location has to be renegotiated in an era of greater urbanization, population mobility and transience, alongside demographic, linguistic and socio-economic differences.
“Membership of a community based on geographical location, for example, has to be renegotiated in an era of greater urbanization, population mobility and transience, alongside demographic, linguistic and socio-economic differences (Isherwood 2009; Crooke 2010).”
From Do you even know what public archaeology is? Trends, theory, practice, ethics (2015) · cites this paper as Crooke 2010
Membership of a local, situated community is an interaction that takes place within a self-defined identity framework and involves some form of community hierarchy.
“As Crooke (2010, 19) notes, membership of a local, situated community is an interaction that takes place within a self-defined identity framework and involves some form of community hierarchy.”
From Do you even know what public archaeology is? Trends, theory, practice, ethics (2015) · cites this paper as Crooke 2010
Community groups may have distinct expectations of the demographic of their membership, especially in areas with contested or controversial community identities.
“Community groups may have distinct expectations of the demographic of their membership, especially in areas with contested or controversial community identities (Crooke 2010).”
From Do you even know what public archaeology is? Trends, theory, practice, ethics (2015) · cites this paper as Crooke 2010
Defining 'community' within the collaborative paradigm presents a continuing philosophical problem in archaeology.
“Defining 'community' within the collaborative paradigm presents a continuing philosophical problem in archaeology (Agbe-Davies 2010, 2011;Crooke 2010;Martindale & Nicholas 2014;Supernant & Warrick 2014).”
From The future of archaeology is (still) community collaboration (2023) · cites this paper as Crooke 2010
Since participatory research methods began gaining traction in heritage fields, practitioners have voiced unease about how participation can lead to a lack of consensus between participants and researchers.
“since participatory research methods began gaining traction in heritage fields, practitioners have voiced resonant unease about the ways participation can lead to a lack of consensus between participants and researchers (e.g., Crooke, 2010;Logan, 2012, 236).”
From Heritage as liberation (2023) · cites this paper as Crooke, 2010
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Bauman Z., 2001, Community seeking safety in an insecure world
- 10.1080/13698230600942075 · DOI
- Clifford J., 1997, Routes: travel and translation in the late twentieth century
- Crooke E., 2007, Museums and community: ideas, issues and challenges
- 10.1080/13581650120105534 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/cdj/37.1.47 · DOI
- 10.1080/13504630701235846 · DOI
- 2008, Making history in Mid Antrim, the Mid‐Antrim Museums Service Community History Programme
- 10.1080/1028663042000255790 · DOI
- 2005, A shared future – policy and strategic framework for Northern Ireland
- 2008, Evaluation of the Community History Programme – final report
- Witcomb A., 2003, Re‐imagining the museum. Beyond the mausoleum, 10.4324/9780203361023 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Do you even know what public archaeology is? Trends, theory, practice, ethics
Richardson, L.-J., & Almansa-Sánchez, J. (2015) · World Archaeology · doi:10.1080/00438243.2015.1017599 · Cited by 140
The future of archaeology is (still) community collaboration
Montgomery, L. M., & Fryer, T. C. (2023) · Antiquity · doi:10.15184/aqy.2023.98 · Cited by 27
Fryer, T. C. (2023) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1111/aman.13844 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Crooke, E.
- Venue
- International Journal of Heritage Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 16-29
- ISSN
- 1352-7258
- 1470-3610
- Cited by
- 92
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
