Cited by 12

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Structural violence and the industrial landscape

Shackel, Paul A.·2019·International Journal of Heritage Studies

Abstract

Paul A. Shackel*aa Department of Anthropology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USAPaul A. Shackel is Professor of Anthropology at the University of Maryland. His research projects focus on the role of archaeology in civic engagement activities related to race and labor. His recent books include: New Philadelphia: An Archaeology of Race in the Heartland (2011), and a coauthored volume with Barbara Little - Archaeology, Heritage and Civic Engagement: Working toward the Public Good (2014). He is currently engaged in a project that focuses on labor and migration in northern Appalachia in the United States and is the subject of Remembering Lattimer: Migration, Labor, and Race in Pennsylvania Anthracite Country (2018).CONTACT Paul A. Shackel pshackel@umd.edu Department of Anthropology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA.ABSTRACTIn the late nineteenth century, a new wave of immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe came to the anthracite coal region of northeastern Pennsylvania. A form of structural violence existed, and as a result the newcomers were underpaid, underfed, worked in treacherous conditions, and lived in substandard housing. Today, coal extraction in the region is almost non-existent, although many industrial ruins and abandoned homes can be found throughout the landscape. While these ruins can highlight the grandeur of capitalism, a more pressing need is to understand how these ruins are reminders of the long-term exploitation…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13527258.2018.1517374

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. Apel D., 2015, Beautiful Terrible Ruins: Detroit and the Anxiety of Decline, 10.36019/9780813574097 · DOI
  2. Arden B., 2009, The Anthracite Coal Region’s Slavic Community
  3. 10.7208/chicago/9780226242828.001.0001 · DOI
  4. Cowie J., 2003, Beyond the Ruins: The Meanings of Deindustrialization
  5. Deasy G. F., 1961, Mineral Industries, 30, 1
  6. Dublin T., 1998, When the Mines Closed: Stories of Struggles in Hard Times
  7. Dublin T., 2005, The Face of Decline: The Pennsylvania Anthracite Region in the Twentieth Century
  8. Edensor T., 2005, Industrial Ruins: Space, Aesthetics and Materiality, 10.5040/9781474214940 · DOI
  9. 10.1177/002234336900600301 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1177/0022343390027003005 · DOI
  11. Goin P., 2004, Changing Mines in America
  12. Guglielmo T., 1999, Mid-America: An Historical Review, 81, 169
  13. Harvey D., 2000, Space of Hope
  14. High S., 2007, Corporate Wasteland: The Landscape and Memory of Deindustrialization
  15. 10.1017/S0147547913000276 · DOI
  16. 10.1111/hic3.v11.11 · DOI
  17. Lam T., 2013, Abandoned Futures: A Journey to the Posthuman World
  18. Little B. J., 2014, Archaeology, Heritage and Civic Engagement: Working toward the Public Good
  19. 10.2752/174063109X12462745321462 · DOI
  20. 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00898.x · DOI · Paper page
  21. Mah A., 2012, Industrial Ruination, Community and Place: Landscapes and Legacies of Urban Decline
  22. 10.5153/sro.3330 · DOI
  23. Nora P., 1996, Realms of Memory, Conflicts and Divisions, 1
  24. Novak M., 1977, The Guns of Lattimer
  25. 10.1007/s10761-012-0189-7 · DOI
  26. Ripley W. Z., 1899, The Races of Europe: A Sociological Study
  27. Roberts P., 1904, Anthracite Coal Communities
  28. 10.1007/s41636-017-0087-2 · DOI
  29. Roller M. P., 2019, An Archaeology of Structural Violence: Life in a Twentieth-Century Coal Town
  30. Savage K., 2003, Beyond the Ruins: The Meanings of Deindustrialization, 237
  31. Shackel P. A., 2009, The Archaeology of American Labor and Working-Class Life
  32. 10.1111/aman.12014 · DOI
  33. 10.1080/13527258.2015.1114009 · DOI
  34. 10.1007/s10761-017-0451-0 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1080/20518196.2017.1385947 · DOI
  36. 10.1007/s10761-017-0451-0 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1007/s10761-006-0004-4 · DOI
  38. 10.1007/s10761-012-0203-0 · DOI
  39. 10.1111/gena.12007 · DOI
  40. 10.1080/13527258.2017.1321034 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Stevenson G. E., 1931, Reflections of an Anthracite Engineer
  42. Stoler A. L., 2008, Quarterly Anthropology, 23, 191
  43. 10.1215/9780822395850-001 · DOI
  44. 10.1017/S0147547913000239 · DOI
  45. Tarone L. A., 2004, We Were Here Once: Successes, Mistakes, & Calamities in Hazleton Area History
  46. Trigg D., 2006, The Aesthetics of Decay: Nothingness, Nostalgia, and the Absence of Reason. New York
  47. Vergara C. J., 1999, American Ruins
  48. Warfel S. G., 1993, A Patch of Land Owned by the Company
  49. Weizman E., 2011, The Least of Two Possible Evils: Humanitarian Violence from Arendt to Gaza
  50. Woodward C., 2002, In Ruins
  51. Žižek S., 2008, Violence: Six Sideways Reflections

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Shackel, P. A.
Venue
International Journal of Heritage Studies
Published
2018-09-14
Volume
25
Issue
7
Pages
750-762
ISSN
  • 1352-7258
  • 1470-3610
Cited by
12
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review