Cited by 8,283Education for Peace and Conflict ResolutionPeacebuilding and International SecurityViolence, Religion, and Philosophy

Violence, Peace, and Peace Research

Galtung, Johan·1969·Journal of Peace Research

Abstract

En su trayectoria como campo cientifico, la Peace Research o Investigacion para la Paz reconoce que definir “paz” es, de hecho, una parte fundamental de una estrategia cientifica. En ese contexto, se ha dedicado a conceptualizar paz de forma amplia, dialogica y compleja, tal como diverso y complejo es el mundo. Del mismo modo, definir violencia se convierte en una labor igualmente compleja, una vez que mas importante que llegar a una definicion o a tipologias, -pues hay, evidentemente, muchos tipos de violencia- indicar dimensiones teoricamente significativas de violencia es efectivamente lo fundamental, una vez que nos puede llevar a pensar, investigar y, potencialmente, actuar ante los problemas mas graves de la humanidad. Si la peace action debe ser considerada porque es una accion contra la violencia, el mismo concepto de violencia debe ser lo suficientemente amplio para incluir las variedades mas significativas y, ademas, tambien debe ser lo suficientemente especifico para servir de base para una accion concreta. En esa perspectiva, este articulo pretende presentar una reflexion teorico conceptual sobre paz y violencia en el contexto de la perspectiva critica de los Estudios para la Paz (Peace Studies).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/002234336900600301

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Galtung argued that violence is structural when it lacks an intentional perpetrator and is instead attributable to policies that shape daily living.

    “Galtung (1969) argued that violence is structural when it lacks an intentional perpetrator, instead attributable to policies that shape daily living.”

    From Huronia’s lessons: how ableist violence determines health (2025) · cites this paper as Galtung (1969)

  • Structural violence is a stabilizing force and a tool of governance that shapes distributions of power.

    “In the latter analogy, violence functions as a tool of governance that shapes distributions of power.”

    From Huronia’s lessons: how ableist violence determines health (2025) · cites this paper as Galtung (1969)

  • In peace studies, the distinction between negative peace and positive peace is a foundational concept.

    “In peace studies, the distinction between “negative peace” and “positive peace” is a foundational concept (Galtung, 1969).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Galtung, J.
Affiliations
Peace Research Institute Oslo (NO)
Corresponding author
Galtung, Johan
Venue
Journal of Peace Research
Published
1969-09-01
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
167-191
ISSN
  • 0022-3433 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-3578
OpenAlex
W2003879332
Cited by
8,283
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 760 · 2025: 669 · 2024: 633 · 2023: 674 · 2022: 721 · 2021: 700 · 2020: 777 · 2019: 481 · 2018: 416 · 2017: 306 · 2016: 360 · 2015: 317 · 2014: 196 · 2013: 227 · 2012: 163
FWCI
24.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Peace Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Education for Peace and Conflict Resolution
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Peacebuilding and International Security
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Violence, Religion, and Philosophy
Keywords
peace studies, violence, concept of peace, conceptualization of violence, critical peace studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review