Cited by 112Digital Marketing and Social MediaMarketing and Advertising StrategiesPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection

Like or dislike? Adolescents’ responses to personalized social network site advertising

Open access
Walrave, Michel, Poels, Karolien, Antheunis, Marjolijn L., Van den Broeck, Evert, van Noort, Guda·2018·Journal of Marketing Communications

Abstract

Increasingly, personal data posted by users of social network sites (SNSs) can be used to personalize advertising. The present study investigates how adolescents respond to personalized ads in terms of attitude toward the ad, brand engagement and intention to forward, and whether privacy concerns moderate their responses. According to pretest results, a medium level of personalization was expected to be optimal in terms of advertising effectiveness. A within-subjects experiment involving 40 participants aged 14–18 years was performed. Three conditions of personalized advertising were designed with, respectively, low, medium, and high levels of personalization. The study found that the highest personalization condition generated the most positive response and that privacy concerns did not moderate the effects of personalization. The privacy paradox is discussed as an alternative explanation, along with other implications of the results.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13527266.2016.1182938

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Walrave, M., Poels, K., Antheunis, M. L., Van den Broeck, E., & van Noort, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Antwerp (BE)
  • Tilburg University (NL)
  • Department of Communication Studies, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
  • Amsterdam School of Communication Research ASCoR, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Corresponding author
Walrave, Michel
Venue
Journal of Marketing Communications
Published
2016-05-25
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
599-616
ISSN
  • 1352-7266 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-4445
OpenAlex
W2407975204
Cited by
112
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
22.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of Marketing Communications (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
University Research Fund (BOF) (FFB140315)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Marketing and Advertising Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Keywords
personalized advertising, social network sites, adolescents, consumer attitudes toward advertising, brand engagement, privacy concerns, privacy paradox, online advertising effectiveness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review