The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Relating developments in children's counterfactual thinking and executive functions
Open accessAbstract
The performance of 93 children aged 3 and 4 years on a battery of different counterfactual tasks was assessed. Three measures: short causal chains, location change counterfactual conditionals, and false syllogisms—but not a fourth, long causal chains—were correlated, even after controlling for age and receptive vocabulary. Children's performance on our counterfactual thinking measure was predicted by receptive vocabulary ability and inhibitory control. The role that domain general executive functions may play in 3- to 4-year olds' counterfactual thinking development is discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In a study with 3–4‐year‐olds, Beck et al. (2009) found that inhibition predicted performance on CFR but found no evidence that WM relates to developments in counterfactual thinking ability.”
From A plausible role of imagination in pretend play, counterfactual reasoning, and executive functions (2023) · cites this paper as Beck et al. (2009)
In the citing paper
“Beck et al. (2009) also reported no significant correlations between WM and CFR.”
From A plausible role of imagination in pretend play, counterfactual reasoning, and executive functions (2023) · cites this paper as Beck et al. (2009)
In the citing paper
“Beck et al. (2009) reported positive correlations between inhibition and CFR.”
From A plausible role of imagination in pretend play, counterfactual reasoning, and executive functions (2023) · cites this paper as Beck et al. (2009)
Citations
Cites
Individual Differences in Inhibitory Control and Children's Theory of Mind
Carlson, S. M., & Moses, L. J. (2001) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00333 · Cited by 2,072
Allison, P. D. (1998) · Cited by 1,721
Gerstadt, C. L., Hong, Y. J., & Diamond, A. (1994) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)90068-x · Cited by 1,598
Inhibitory Control in Young Children and Its Role in Emerging Internalization
Kochanska, G., Murray, K. T., Jacques, T. Y., Koenig, A. L., & Vandegeest, K. A. (1996) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01747.x · Cited by 940
Carlson, S. M., Moses, L. J., & Breton, C. (2002) · Infant and Child Development · doi:10.1002/icd.298 · Cited by 907
Executive function in preschoolers: Links with theory of mind and verbal ability
Hughes, C. H. (1998) · British Journal of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-835x.1998.tb00921.x · Cited by 759
The Contribution of Executive Functions to Emergent Mathematic Skills in Preschool Children
Espy, K. A., McDiarmid, M. M., Cwik, M. F., Stalets, M. M., Hamby, A., & Senn, T. E. (2004) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1207/s15326942dn2601_6 · Cited by 687
de Villiers, J. G., & Pyers, J. E. (2002) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/s0885-2014(02)00073-4 · Cited by 661
Carlson, S. M., Moses, L. J., & Claxton, L. J. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2004.01.002 · Cited by 614
The rational imagination: how people create alternatives to reality
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-2737 · Cited by 603
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Explaining machine learning classifiers through diverse counterfactual explanations
Mothilal, R. K., Sharma, A., & Tan, C. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3351095.3372850 · Cited by 1,233
Counterfactual explanations and how to find them: literature review and benchmarking
Guidotti, R. (2022) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-022-00831-6 · Cited by 583
The Functional Theory of Counterfactual Thinking: New Evidence, New Challenges, New Insights
Roese, N. J., & Epstude, K. (2017) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2017.02.001 · Cited by 255
The power of possibility: causal learning, counterfactual reasoning, and pretend play
Buchsbaum, D., Bridgers, S., Skolnick Weisberg, D., & Gopnik, A. (2012) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0122 · Cited by 200
Counterfactual reasoning: From childhood to adulthood
Rafetseder, E., Schwitalla, M., & Perner, J. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2012.10.010 · Cited by 184
Metadata
- Authors
- Beck, S. R., Riggs, K. J., & Gorniak, S. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Birmingham (GB)
- London Metropolitan University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Beck, Sarah R.
- Venue
- Thinking & Reasoning
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-11
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 337-354
- ISSN
- 1354-6783 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0708
- OpenAlex
- W2048089934
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 11.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Thinking & Reasoning (publishedVersion)
- Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull) (submittedVersion)
- University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Economic and Social Research Council (RES-000-22-1683)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
- Keywords
- counterfactual reasoning, executive function, inhibitory control, young children, causal reasoning, receptive vocabulary, domain-general cognition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
