Cited by 12Nursing care and researchGrief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthIntergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Coping and guilt in informal caregivers: a predictive model based on structural equations

Open access
Muro Pérez-Aradros, Cecilia, Navarro-Prados, Ana-Belén, Satorres, Encarna, Serra, Emilia, Meléndez, Juan C.·2023·Psychology, Health & Medicine

Abstract

Caregivers experience great stress, and coping can be one of the factors, which determine the extent of stress. The aim of the present paper is to analyze the effects of coping strategies on distress of the older adult's caregiver, including guilt as a mediating factor in those maladaptive strategies. The sample consisted of 201 informal caregivers of institutionalized older adults. The three constructs measured were: stress, guilt, and coping strategies. Results showed that strategies that have a better ability to reduce stress are active, positive reframing and acceptance; on the contrary, behavioral disengagement, self-distraction, self-blame and venting positively predicted the feeling of guilt that facilitated the perception of stress. Given the important association obtained between the experience of guilt and psychological distress in caregivers, it could be relevant to develop psychoeducational interventions with caregivers including techniques to reduce this feeling of guilt and develop cognitive behavioral strategies that facilitate adaptation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13548506.2022.2029917

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. 10.1017/S1041610207005182 · DOI
  2. 10.1207/s15327558ijbm0401_6 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1037/0022-3514.66.1.184 · DOI
  4. 10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1093/geronb/62.5.P253 · DOI
  6. 10.2307/2136404 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/S0887-6185(99)00046-8 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.jad.2019.06.038 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05725.x · DOI
  10. 10.1080/07317115.2020.1769244 · DOI
  11. 10.3928/00989134-20060601-07 · DOI
  12. 10.2190/91A8-XCE1-3NGX-X2M7 · DOI
  13. 10.1080/13548506.2020.1803372 · DOI
  14. 10.1177/2055102918810659 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1002/jts.20689 · DOI
  16. 10.3928/0098-9134-20010201-13 · DOI
  17. 10.1348/135910703762879174 · DOI
  18. Lazarus R. S., 1984, Stress, appraisal, and coping
  19. 10.1080/07317115.2018.1461162 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1017/S1041610210000074 · DOI
  21. 10.1002/cpp.2116 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.archger.2016.11.001 · DOI
  23. 10.1023/A:1012731520781 · DOI
  24. 10.1080/1533256X.2011.544600 · DOI
  25. 10.11144/Javeriana.upsy9-2.capv · DOI
  26. Muscat M., 2018, Journal of Aging Research & Clinical Practice, 7, 128
  27. 10.1093/geront/30.5.583 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.3390/ijerph16091651 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1093/geront/gny022 · DOI
  30. 10.1111/opn.12227 · DOI
  31. 10.1177/0891988715588830 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.archger.2009.07.008 · DOI
  33. 10.1037/0003-066X.41.7.813 · DOI
  34. 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02550.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Muro Pérez-Aradros, C., Navarro-Prados, A.-B., Satorres, E., Serra, E., & Meléndez, J. C.
Affiliations
  • Department of Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
  • Department of Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Salamanca (Spain), Salamanca, Spain
  • Universitat de València (ES)
Corresponding author
Meléndez, Juan C.
Venue
Psychology, Health & Medicine
Published
2022-01-20
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
819-830
ISSN
  • 1354-8506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3966
OpenAlex
W4205354013
Cited by
12
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1
FWCI
4.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Psychology Health & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Gredos (University of Salamanca) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Repository of Digital Objects for Teaching Research and Culture (University of Valencia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
no funding associated with the work
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Keywords
informal caregivers, guilt, coping strategies, caregiver stress, psychological distress, older adults, institutionalized elderly, maladaptive coping, positive reframing, acceptance, self-blame, venting, behavioral disengagement, self-distraction, mediation
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Emotions, Guilt, Humans, Stress, Psychological, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review