Cited by 21Water Resource Management and QualityWater Governance and InfrastructureGender, Education, and Development Issues

Gender and community mobilisation for urban water infrastructure investment in southern Nigeria

Acey, Charisma·2010·Gender & Development

Abstract

Although women in urban households in Nigeria are primarily responsible for sourcing and managing domestic water supplies, their responses to problems with obtaining water have to be negotiated within the context of gender power relations, roles and responsibilities, both within and outside the household. This article, focusing on women in poor communities in Lagos and Benin City, Nigeria, shows that there is some relationship between women's desire to organise for water improvements, and membership in voluntary associations. However, women are generally unable to influence decision-making in the sector through voluntary associations, and are excluded from actual participation in the business of water supply and the associated economic opportunities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13552071003599970

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Women and girls feared, risked, or experienced varied harms related to their water and sanitation circumstances and activities, with water fetching related harms in particular resulting in serious and long-term consequences, including general and localized pain, headaches and head injury, and injury from falls, trucks, and/or car accidents.

    “Women and girls feared, risked, or experienced, varied harms related to their water and sanitation circumstances and activities (_((((xxx))))_)[62, 63, 78, 90, 101, 135, 141, 143, 144, 158, 168-170, 172-174, 177-179, 181, 182, 184, 186, 187, 189-191, 197-199, 201, 214, 226, 231, 244, 257, 258, 261, 276, 277, 296].Many noted exacerbated”
  • Women accessed social networks to address water and sanitation problems and take on roles, including lobbying officials, raising complaints with local authorities, leveraging village council connections to access latrine construction subsidies, and creating strategic alliances with male household members.

    “Women accessed social networks to address water and sanitation problems and take on roles [65,79,90,95,135,149,158,193].They used social networks to lobby officials to solve water problems (Thailand [193]), raise complaints with local authorities about water issues (Ecuador [79] and Nigeria [158]), leverage village council connections to access latrine construction subsidies (India [135]), and”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Acey, C.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Acey, Charisma
Venue
Gender & Development
Published
2010-02-25
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
11-26
ISSN
  • 1355-2074 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-9221
OpenAlex
W2055514781
Cited by
21
References
25
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Gender & Development (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Resource Management and Quality
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Water Governance and Infrastructure
  • Social Sciences › Education › Gender, Education, and Development Issues
Keywords
gender, community mobilization, urban water infrastructure, water supply, women, gender and power, civil society organizations, women's participation, decision-making, low-income communities, Lagos, Benin City

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review