Cited by 34Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareCultural Competency in Health Care

Enhancing patient participation of older migrant cancer patients: needs, barriers, and eHealth

Open access
Yılmaz, Nida Gizem, Sungur, Hande, van Weert, Julia C.M., van den Muijsenbergh, Maria E.T.C., Schouten, Barbara C.·2022·Ethnicity & Health

Abstract

Objectives To gain insight into (1) the unfulfilled instrumental and affective needs of Turkish-Dutch and Moroccan-Dutch older cancer patients/survivors, (2) the barriers perceived by healthcare professionals in fulfilling these needs, and (3) how the Health Communicator, a multilingual eHealth tool, can support the fulfillment of patients’/survivors’ needs, and decrease professionals’ barriers.Design We conducted a pre-implementation study of the Health Communicator using semi-structured interviews with Turkish-Dutch (n = 10; mean age = 69.10) and Moroccan-Dutch (n = 9; mean age = 69.33) older cancer patients/survivors, and held two focus groups with general practitioners (GPs; n = 7; mean age 45.14) and oncology nurses (ONs; n = 5; mean age = 49.60). Topic list consisted of questions related to needs and perceived barriers. Analysis was based on grounded theory. The acceptance of the Health Communicator was inquired by questions based on the concepts of the Technology Acceptance Model, and analyzed deductively.Results Patients/survivors reported unfulfilled needs concerning: (1) information about cancer (treatment), (2) information about the healthcare system, (3) possibilities regarding psychosocial support, and (4) doctor-patient relationship. Among professionals, the main perceived barriers were: (1) patients’/survivors’ low health literacy and language barrier, (2) cultural taboo, (3) lack of insight into patients’ instrumental needs, and (4) patients’/survivors’ lack of trust in Dutch healthcare. Both patients/survivors and professionals thought that implementing the Health Communicator could be effective in fulfilling most of the needs and decreasing the barriers. However, a majority of the patients/survivors were hesitant regarding the use of it, because they found it too difficult to use. Professionals showed a positive intention towards using the Health Communicator.Conclusions To enhance patient participation among older migrant cancer patients/survivors, the Health Communicator is, under certain conditions, a promising tool for fulfilling patients’/survivors’ unfulfilled instrumental and affective needs and for bridging barriers perceived by professionals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13557858.2020.1857338

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Digital literacy, language, access to devices, reliable internet connectivity, and confidence using technology affected participation across several studies.

    “Digital literacy, language, access to devices, reliable internet connectivity, and confidence using technology affected participation across several studies [25,37,46,48,50,58].”

    From Digital health technologies in oncology services: A scoping review of clinical implementation, organisational evidence gaps, and policy implications (2026) · cites this paper as [48]

    The Language barrier and low health literacy section identifies language as a barrier to participation. The Technology acceptance section reports difficulty using the Health Communicator and doubts about being able to use it, supporting the digital-skills and confidence portions. The cited paper does not establish that access to devices or reliable internet connectivity affected participation. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yılmaz, N. G., Sungur, H., van Weert, J. C. M., van den Muijsenbergh, M. E. T. C., & Schouten, B. C.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Department of Communication Science, Amsterdam School of Communication Research/ASCoR, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Corresponding author
Yılmaz, Nida Gizem
Venue
Ethnicity & Health
Published
2020-12-14
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
1123-1146
ISSN
  • 1355-7858 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3419
OpenAlex
W3113006135
Cited by
34
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ethnicity and Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Dutch Cancer Foundation
  • KWF Kankerbestrijding
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
Keywords
patient participation, elderly cancer patients, cancer survivors, migrant patients, Turkish-Dutch, Moroccan Dutch, e-health, multilingual health communication, patient needs, barriers to care, health literacy, language barriers, cultural taboos, trust in healthcare, physician-patient relationship, psychosocial support, technology acceptance, general practitioners, oncology nurses
MeSH terms
Aged, Humans, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Patient Participation, Physician-Patient Relations, Transients and Migrants, Telemedicine, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review