Cited by 732Media Influence and HealthBehavioral Health and InterventionsCommunication and COVID-19 Impact

Using the limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing to design effective cancer communication messages

Lang, Annie·2006·Journal of Communication

Abstract

This paper applies the limited capacity model of motivated mediated messages (LC4MP) to the problem of creating effective messages about cancer. A general description of the model is presented and then applied specifically to the task of creating effective cancer communication messages by asking the following questions about cancer communication: (a) What is the goal of the message? (b) Who is in the target market? (c) What medium will carry the message? and (d) What is the motivational and personal relevance of the main information in the message for the majority of people in the target market? The paper concludes that cancer is a motivationally relevant topic that will elicit aversive activation. Target markets for various types of cancer-related messages (e.g., smokers or people of a certain age) will process mediated messages in predictably different ways making certain design decisions better for certain target markets. Both structural and content elements of messages interact with the limited capacity information processing system to impact resource allocation, which in turn determines how well messages are encoded, stored, and retrieved at a decision point. Individual differences in peoples’ motivational activation influence both their tendencies to engage in risky behaviors that increase the probabilities of getting cancer and their processing of health-related messages. Future research from this perspective should be done to optimize cancer messages for specific targ…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00283.x

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cognitive learning theories assume that using multiple streams of information decreases information processing because of limited cognitive capacity.

    “Second, several cognitive learning theories assume that using multiple streams of information decreases information processing as a result of people's limited cognitive capacity (Lang, 2000(Lang, , 2006;;Salvucci & Taatgen, 2008;Salvucci & Taatgen, 2010).”

    From The consequences of media multitasking for youth: A review (2015) · cites this paper as Lang, 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lang, A.
Affiliations
Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
Lang, Annie
Venue
Journal of Communication
Published
2006-08-01
Volume
56
Issue
suppl_1
Pages
S57-S80
ISSN
  • 0021-9916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2466
OpenAlex
W1994961305
Cited by
732
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 22
FWCI
284.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Communication (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
Keywords
cancer communication, health messaging, message design, target audience, media influence, motivational relevance, individual differences, risk-taking, message processing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review