Cited by 3Interprofessional Education and CollaborationInnovations in Medical EducationInterdisciplinary Research and Collaboration

Approaching undergraduate interprofessional education (IPE) from a holistic program design perspective: an umbrella review

Open access
Bartholomew, Nicola, McKillop, Aine, Barr, Owen·2026·Journal of Interprofessional Care

Abstract

This umbrella review explores systematic reviews relating to interprofessional education implementation within the undergraduate, higher education health and social care context. The aim was to identify curriculum design factors underpinning holistic program level planning that may help to scaffold the integration of interprofessional competency development. The review was undertaken in alignment with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement and in accordance with recommendations outlined by the Joanna Briggs Institute. Electronic databases CINAHL Ultimate, MEDLINE, and ERIC were searched using the PICo strategy and keywords. The search generated 34 potential articles. Following the exclusion of duplicates and through screening out articles unrelated to the PICo framework, 17 full text systematic reviews were identified for inclusion exploring different aspects of IPE implementation within undergraduate, pre-registration education. The review and discussion generated design recommendations to be considered by higher education providers and curriculum planners aiming to implement sustainable interprofessional education practices.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13561820.2025.2582054

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bartholomew, N., McKillop, A., & Barr, O.
Affiliations
University of Ulster (GB)
Corresponding author
Bartholomew, Nicola
Venue
Journal of Interprofessional Care
Published
2025-12-09
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
400-416
ISSN
  • 1356-1820 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-9567
OpenAlex
W4417170482
Cited by
3
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 3
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Interprofessional Care (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ulster University Research Portal (Ulster University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Keywords
interprofessional education, undergraduate health professions education, curriculum development, pre-registration education, health and social care education, curriculum implementation
MeSH terms
Interprofessional Education, Curriculum, Health Occupations, Humans, Interprofessional Relations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review