CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 41Problem and Project Based LearningInnovative Education and Learning PracticesHigher Education and Employability

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Doing, being, becoming: a historical appraisal of the modalities of project-based learning

Hanney, Roy·2018·Teaching in Higher Education
DOI 10.1080/13562517.2017.1421628
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Any pedagogy of media practice sits at the intersection between training for employment and education for critical thinking. As such, the use of projects is a primary means of structuring learning experiences as a means of mirroring professional practice. Yet, our understanding of the nature of projects and of project-based learning is arguably under-theorised and largely taken for granted. This paper attempts to address this issue through a synthesis of the literature from organisational studies and experiential learning. The article aims to shift the debate around project-based learning away from an instrumentalist agenda, to one that considers the social context and lived experience of projects and re-conceptualises projects as ontological modalities of doing, being and becoming. In this way, the article aims to provide a means for thinking about the use of project-based learning within the media practice curriculum that draws on metaphors of discovery, rather than of construction.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13562517.2017.1421628

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Aristotle, 2001, Nicomachean Ethics
  2. DeCarlo Doug., 2004, eXtreme Project Management: Using Leadership, Principles, and Tools to Deliver Value in the Face of Volatility
  3. Dewey John., 1960, On Experience, Nature and Freedom
  4. Fischman Lee., 2008, The PM Podcast
  5. Fitchner Cornelius., 2011, The PM Podcast
  6. Garraway James., 2005, Southern African Journal of Education, 25, 217
  7. Knoll Michael., 1997, Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 34, 59
  8. Navarre C., 1993, Pilotage de projet et entreprises; diversité et convergences, 181
  9. Packendorff Johann, 2014, Southern African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 17, 7
  10. Woodward Calvin Milton., 1887, The Manual Training School, Comprising a Full Statement of its Aims, Methods, and Results

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 41

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Hanney, R.
Affiliations
Southampton Solent University (GB)
Corresponding author
Hanney, Roy
ORCID
Hanney, Roy
Venue
Teaching in Higher Education
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2018-01
Volume
23
Issue
6
Pages
769-783
ISSN
  • 1356-2517 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-1294
DOI
10.1080/13562517.2017.1421628
OpenAlex
W2782184065
Cited by
41
References
32
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2
FWCI
11.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Teaching in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
  • Southampton Solent University Digital Library (acceptedVersion)
  • Solent University Research Portal (Solent University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Solent Learning & Teaching Institute
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education and Employability
Keywords
project-based learning, experiential learning, discovery learning, professional practice, critical thinking, history of project-based learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review