Outsourcing governance: states and the politics of a ‘global value chain world’
Open accessAbstract
Politics, and by extension states, are marginal in debates about the genesis, evolution and functioning of the global value chain (GVC)-based global economy. We contend here that the core complexity of state agency and state power needs to be much more carefully understood in GVC and related debates, as a basis on which the governance of the evolving GVC world can be properly theorised as revolving around the inseparability of economic and political power. We advance a framework for understanding the role of politics and states in the construction and maintenance of a GVC world, using a three-fold typology of facilitative, regulatory and distributive forms of governance, and propose a notion of ‘outsourcing governance’ as an attempt to capture the ways in which states purposefully, through active political agency, have engaged in a process of delegating a variety of governance functions and authority to private actors. Our overarching argument is normative: ‘outsourced governance’ of the form we currently observe is associated with regressive distributional outcomes, and is antithetical to an inclusive and sustainable global economy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some national governments, such as the UK and Australia, have engaged in a process of outsourcing governance whereby the state delegates a variety of governance functions and authority to private actors, most often large firms.
“Some national governments, such as the UK and Australia, have engaged in a process of ‘outsourcing governance’ (Mayer and Phillips 2017) whereby the state delegates a variety of governance functions and authority to private actors most often large firms.”
From Historicizing Modern Slavery: Free-Grown Sugar as an Ethics-Driven Market Category in Nineteenth-Century Britain (2020) · cites this paper as Mayer and Phillips 2017
Cites
Global production networks and the analysis of economic development
Henderson, J., Dicken, P., Hess, M., Coe, N., & Yeung, H. W.-C. (2002) · Review of International Political Economy · doi:10.1080/09692290210150842 · Cited by 2,216 · see citing works
Dallas, M. P. (2015) · Review of International Political Economy · doi:10.1080/09692290.2015.1018920 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Global production networks: mapping recent conceptual developments
Coe, N. M., & Yeung, H. W.-C. (2019) · Journal of Economic Geography · doi:10.1093/jeg/lbz018 · Cited by 386 · see citing works
Alford, M., & Phillips, N. (2018) · Review of International Political Economy · doi:10.1080/09692290.2017.1423367 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Self-citationSmith, A., & Johns, J. (2020) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04318-1 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mayer, F. W., & Phillips, N.
- Affiliations
- Duke University (US)
- University of Sheffield (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Phillips, Nicola
- ORCID
- Phillips, Nicola
- Venue
- New Political Economy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-01-04
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 134-152
- ISSN
- 1356-3467 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-9923
- OpenAlex
- W2570876064
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 4
- FWCI
- 39.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- New Political Economy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- World Bank Group
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Globalization and political ideologies
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › World Systems and Global Transformations
- Keywords
- global value chains, outsourcing governance, state government agencies, state power, governance typology, political and economic power, distributional effects
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review