The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rethinking the Role of State-owned Enterprises in China’s Rise
Abstract
The massive overseas expansion of Chinese state-owned enterprises (SOEs) is a central aspect of China’s ‘rise’ to great-power status. There is significant disagreement, however, over how to interpret SOEs’ role. Are they instruments of Chinese statecraft, being directed purposefully from Beijing as part of a ‘grand strategy’? Or are they relatively autonomous, profit-maximising businesses, their free-wheeling behaviour often undermining Chinese foreign policy? Finding that there is evidence for both theses, we provide a framework to explain this. We propose theorising party-state/SOEs relations using the concepts of state transformation and regulatory statehood. We show that the Chinese state’s fragmentation, decentralisation and internationalisation since the late 1970s has substantially increased SOE autonomy and weakened but also transformed the executive’s control, reconfiguring it towards a regulatory mode of governance. Party-state/SOEs relations are thus characterised not by direct command and control but weak oversight and ongoing struggles within the party-state. We illustrate this using a case study of China Power Investment Corporation and its Myitsone hydropower dam project in Myanmar. Here, a central SOE clearly defied and subverted central regulations, profoundly damaging Sino-Myanmar state-to-state relations. Party-state authorities are now struggling to rein in this and other central SOEs.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Eventually, the most common technical strategies of online repression rely on ISPs to manipulate either the routing or packet forwarding mechanisms 58 to implement full or partial censorship of the internet.”
From Authoritarian collaboration and repression in the digital age: balancing foreign direct investment and control in internet infrastructure (2026) · cites this paper as [58]
Citations
Cites
The rise of the regulatory state in Europe
Majone, G. (1994) · West European Politics · doi:10.1080/01402389408425031 · Cited by 1,925
‘Fragmented Authoritarianism 2.0’: Political Pluralization in the Chinese Policy Process
Mertha, A. (2009) · The China Quarterly · doi:10.1017/s0305741009990592 · Cited by 936
The Rise of the Regulatory State
Glaeser, E. L., & Shleifer, A. (2001) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/.41.2.401 · Cited by 767
Governing China: From Revolution Through Reform
Campbell, D. (1995) · Pacific Affairs · doi:10.2307/2761288 · Cited by 626
Woods, K. (2011) · The Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066150.2011.607699 · Cited by 461
China’s ‘New Silk Roads’: sub-national regions and networks of global political economy
Summers, T. (2016) · Third World Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01436597.2016.1153415 · Cited by 387
The China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly
Swanström, N. L. P. (2006) · Cited by 315
Pei, M. (2016) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/9780674974340 · Cited by 299
Chinese Economic Statecraft: Commercial Actors, Grand Strategy, and State Control
Libut, J. E. (2016) · International Journal of China Studies · Cited by 290
China into Africa: trade, aid, and influence
(2009) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-5865 · Cited by 284
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Andrews-Speed P., 2010, The Institutions of Energy Governance in China
- Canning C., 2007, Security Challenges, 3, 47
- Downs E.S., 2014, China Brief, 6
- Guo X., 2007, Towards Resolution: China in the Myanmar Issue
- Jiang D., 2012, Journal of International Economic Cooperation, 4, 58
- Jiang D., 2013, China Economy Report, 6, 105
- Johnson C.K., 2016, President Xi Jinping’s ‘Belt and Road’ Initiative: A Practical Assessment of the Chinese Communist Party’s Roadmap for China’s Global Resurgence
- Li X., 2012, Global Review, 2, 15
- Wang X., 2011, Supervision in China, 20, 56
- Zhang Q., 2013, World Economics and Politics, 117
Cited by
Jones, L., & Zeng, J. (2019) · Third World Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01436597.2018.1559046 · Cited by 368
Self-citationState Capitalism(s) Redux?: Theories, Tensions, Controversies
Alami, I., & Dixon, A. D. (2019) · Competition & Change · doi:10.1177/1024529419881949 · Cited by 277
“Jones and Zou (2017) explore the case study of a Chinese SOE investing in hydropower energy in Myanmar.”
BackgroundChina’s foreign aid system: structure, agencies, and identities
Zhang, D., & Smith, G. (2017) · Third World Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01436597.2017.1333419 · Cited by 172
The Spectre of State Capitalism
Alami, I., & Dixon, A. D. (2024) · doi:10.1093/9780198925224.001.0001 · Cited by 148
Beyond Donation: China’s Policy Banks and the Reshaping of Development Finance
Chen, M. (2020) · Studies in Comparative International Development · doi:10.1007/s12116-020-09310-9 · Cited by 109
“The state is fragmented and decentralized, and various actors such as state-owned enterprises, local governments, and business groups leverage on the party state’s Belt and Road Initiative to pursue their own interests (Jones and Zou 2017; Ye 2019; Liao 2019; Li and Zeng 2019).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, L., & Zou, Y.
- Affiliations
- Queen Mary University of London (GB)
- Shenzhen University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zou, Yizheng
- Venue
- New Political Economy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-05-03
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 743-760
- ISSN
- 1356-3467 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-9923
- OpenAlex
- W2610527125
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 47.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- New Political Economy (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Shenzhen University (16QNFC18)
- China National Social Science Fund (15@ZH009)
- Australian Research Council (DP1701102647)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Business and FDI
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › State Capitalism and Financial Governance
- Keywords
- state-owned enterprises, China's rise, party-state governance, state transformation, Sino-Myanmar relations, great power status, Chinese foreign policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rethinking the Role of State-owned Enterprises in China’s Rise. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13563467.2017.1321625
- The paper
- Jones, L., & Zou, Y. (2017). Rethinking the Role of State-owned Enterprises in China’s Rise. New Political Economy. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2017.1321625