The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ideology and discourse analysis
Abstract
Contrary to most traditional approaches, ideologies are defined here within a multidisciplinary framework that combines a social, cognitive and discursive component. As ‘systems of ideas’, ideologies are sociocognitively defined as shared representations of social groups, and more specifically as the ‘axiomatic’ principles of such representations. As the basis of a social group's self-image, ideologies organize its identity, actions, aims, norms and values, and resources as well as its relations to other social groups. Ideologies are distinct from the sociocognitive basis of broader cultural communities, within which different ideological groups share fundamental beliefs such as their cultural knowledge. Ideologies are expressed and generally reproduced in the social practices of their members, and more particularly acquired, confirmed, changed and perpetuated through discourse. Although general properties of language and discourse are not, as such, ideologically marked, systematic discourse analysis offers powerful methods to study the structures and functions of ‘underlying’ ideologies. The ideological polarization between ingroups and outgroups— a prominent feature of the structure of ideologies—may also be systematically studied at all levels of text and talk, e.g. by analysing how members of ingroups typically emphasize their own good deeds and properties and the bad ones of the outgroup, and mitigate or deny their own bad ones and the good ones of the outgroup.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis
van Dijk, T. A. (1993) · Discourse & Society · doi:10.1177/0957926593004002006 · Cited by 5,077
Self-citationMethods of Critical Discourse Analysis
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2001) · doi:10.4135/9780857028020 · Cited by 4,725
Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications
Anderson, J. R. (2014) · Cited by 4,121
Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures
Hunt, E., Schank, R., & Abelson, R. (1979) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421499 · Cited by 2,944
Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach
van Dijk, T. (2000) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446217856 · Cited by 2,850
Self-citationTHE NATURE OF BELIEF SYSTEMS IN MASS PUBLICS
Converse, P. E. (2004) · Aarhus University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/jj.35529187.18 · Cited by 2,499
Fairclough, N. (2013) · doi:10.4324/9781315834368 · Cited by 1,954
Eagleton, T. (1991) · Cited by 1,577
Studies in the Theory of Ideology
Thompson, J. B. (1984) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/9780520312234 · Cited by 1,385
Ideology and Utopia: an Introduction to the Sociology of Knowledge
(1937) · International Affairs · doi:10.2307/2603547 · Cited by 1,298
Cited by
Barrett, M., Heracleous, L., & Walsham, G. (2013) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2013/37.1.09 · Cited by 128
A thematic analysis of attitudes towards English nonbinary pronouns
Hekanaho, L. (2022) · Journal of Language and Sexuality · doi:10.1075/jls.21025.hek · Cited by 28
Sterling, J., & Jost, J. T. (2018) · Journal of Language and Politics · doi:10.1075/jlp.17034.ste · Cited by 24
The role of language ideologies in the self-efficacy of preservice bilingual education teachers
Szwed, A., & González-Carriedo, R. (2019) · Bilingual Research Journal · doi:10.1080/15235882.2019.1593262 · Cited by 18
Polak, M. D. (2026) · Ethnic and Racial Studies · doi:10.1080/01419870.2026.2642953 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- VAN DIJK, T. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Political Ideologies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 115-140
- ISSN
- 1356-9317 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-9613
- OpenAlex
- W2100400386
- Cited by
- 1,247
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 19.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ideology and discourse analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13569310600687908
- The paper
- VAN DIJK, T. A. (2006). Ideology and discourse analysis. Journal of Political Ideologies. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310600687908
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.