The DOI matches its Crossref record.
How Far, by Which Route and Why? A Spatial Analysis of Pedestrian Preference
Abstract
This paper reports on a survey of pedestrian trips to transit that examined the trip lengths and route choices made by people walking to five rail transit stations in California and Oregon. In highly motorized countries such as the US, policy-makers are beginning to recognize that shifting some travel from auto trips to walking trips can help the country achieve important policy objectives such as combating obesity and reducing the air pollution and oil dependency that result from auto use. However, researchers know very little about pedestrian behaviour and the role of the built and aesthetic environment in influencing pedestrian trips to transit. As communities wrestle with the interconnected issues of obesity, sprawl, and quality of life, planners need to understand how far Americans will walk to transit and the environmental factors that influence them. This survey of 328 pedestrians walking to rail stations, primarily on weekday mornings, found that they were willing to walk an average of half a mile to the rail station and that minimizing the distance walked was the most important factor influencing their choice of route. The people surveyed also frequently mentioned safety factors as important in route choice. Aesthetic elements of the built environment, on the other hand, were rarely mentioned as important route choice factors. The paper concludes by using these survey findings to recommend strategies that planners, designers, and policy-makers can use to design successful transit and pedestrian-oriented developments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Neighborhood Food Environment and Walkability Predict Obesity in New York City
Rundle, A., Neckerman, K. M., Freeman, L., Lovasi, G. S., Purciel, M., Quinn, J., Richards, C., Sircar, N., & Weiss, C. (2009) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.11590 · Cited by 411
Tribby, C. P., Miller, H. J., Brown, B. B., Werner, C. M., & Smith, K. R. (2017) · Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science · doi:10.1177/0265813516659286 · Cited by 76
“For example, research finds a range of mean walking distance to rail stops from 1,000m in Perth, Australia (Canepa, 2007) to 933m in Portland, Oregon and San Francisco, CA (Agrawal et al., 2008), to 564m in Montreal, Canada (El-Geneidy et al., 2013).”
Nearby outdoor recreation modelling: an agent-based approach
Morelle, K., Buchecker, M., Kienast, F., & Tobias, S. (2019) · Urban Forestry & Urban Greening · doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2018.07.007 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Weinstein Agrawal, A., Schlossberg, M., & Irvin, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Urban Design
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-02
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 81-98
- ISSN
- 1357-4809 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-9664
- OpenAlex
- W2164526959
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.