Cited by 76Urban Transport and AccessibilityUrban Design and Spatial AnalysisTransportation Planning and Optimization

Analyzing walking route choice through built environments using random forests and discrete choice techniques

Open access
Tribby, Calvin P, Miller, Harvey J, Brown, Barbara B, Werner, Carol M, Smith, Ken R·2017·Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science

Abstract

Walking is a form of active transportation with numerous benefits, including better health outcomes, lower environmental impacts and stronger communities. Understanding built environmental associations with walking behavior is a key step towards identifying design features that support walking. Human mobility data available through GPS receivers and cell phones, combined with high resolution walkability data, provide a rich source of georeferenced data for analyzing environmental associations with walking behavior. However, traditional techniques such as route choice models have difficulty with highly dimensioned data. This paper develops a novel combination of a data-driven technique with route choice modeling for leveraging walkability audits. Using data from a study in Salt Lake City, UT, USA, we apply the data-driven technique of random forests to select variables for use in walking route choice models. We estimate data-driven route choice models and theory-driven models based on predefined walkability dimensions. Results indicate that the random forest technique selects variables that dramatically improve goodness of fit of walking route choice models relative to models based on predefined walkability dimensions. We compare the theory-driven and data-driven walking route choice models based on interpretability and policy relevance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0265813516659286

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mobile phone sensors provide new means to understand personal travel demand and urban topology, such as walking route choices.

    “Also, mobile phone sensors provide new means to understand personal travel demand and the urban topology, such as walking route choices [795].”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [795]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Gallimore JM Brown BB Werner CM 2011b Walking routes to school in new urban and suburban neighborhoods: An environmental walkability analysis of blocks and routes Journal of Environmental Psychology 31 2 184 191
  2. de Ortúzar JD Willumsen LG 2001 Modelling transport 3rd J Wiley Chichester; New York

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tribby, C. P., Miller, H. J., Brown, B. B., Werner, C. M., & Smith, K. R.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
Corresponding author
Tribby, Calvin P
Venue
Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science
Published
2016-07-20
Volume
44
Issue
6
Pages
1145-1167
ISSN
  • 2399-8083 (ISSN-L)
  • 2399-8091
OpenAlex
W2478851384
Cited by
76
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3
FWCI
8.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environment and Planning B Urban Analytics and City Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R01CA157509)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
Keywords
built environment, walkability, random forest, feature selection, discrete choice models, active travel, GPS mobility data, model interpretability, urban design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review