Cited by 100Workaholism, burnout, and well-beingWorkplace Health and Well-beingWork-Family Balance Challenges

Recovery opportunities, work-home interference, and well-being among managers

Taris, Toon W., Beckers, Debby G. J., Verhoeven, Lotus C., Geurts, Sabine A. E., Kompier, Michiel A. J., van der Linden, Dimitri·2006·European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology

Abstract

The present study addressed the associations among various indicators of effort expenditure at work and recovery opportunities (perceived job demands and job control, hours worked overtime, hours worked according to one's contract), work – home interference, and well-being (exhaustion and enjoyment) in a cross-sectional study among 117 male and 82 female managers. Drawing on effort-recovery theory, we expected that high job demands, low job control, a high number of hours worked overtime, and a full-time appointment would be associated with high levels of work – home interference, low levels of enjoyment, and high levels of exhaustion. Stepwise regression analysis largely supported the hypothesis that high job demands and low job control are associated with adverse work outcomes. However, the effects of the number of hours worked overtime and according to one's contract were usually weak and insignificant, suggesting that high effort expenditure does not necessarily have adverse health consequences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13594320500513889

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Taris, T. W., Beckers, D. G. J., Verhoeven, L. C., Geurts, S. A. E., Kompier, M. A. J., & van der Linden, D.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Taris, Toon W.
Venue
European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
Published
2006-06
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
139-157
ISSN
  • 1359-432X (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0643
OpenAlex
W2051410013
Cited by
100
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 16
FWCI
6.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Workaholism, burnout, and well-being
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
Keywords
work-home interference, job demands, job control, overtime, exhaustion, enjoyment, well-being, managers, occupational health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review