The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bullying and harassment at work and their relationships to work environment quality: An exploratory study
Abstract
The aim of this study is to explore relationships between organizational and social work conditions and the occurrence of bullying and harassment at work. Bullying and harassment are situations where a worker or supervisor is systematically mistreated and victimized by fellow workers or supervisors through repeated negative acts like insulting remarks and ridicule, verbal abuse, offensive teasing, isolation, and social exclusion, or the constant degrading of one's work and efforts. A postal questionnaire was distributed to 4200 members of six different labour unions, together with 500 representatives from the Norwegian Employers' Federation (NHO). Two thousand two hundred and fifteen responded, yielding a response rate of 47%. The results show that the occurrence of bullying and harassment is significantly correlated with all the seven measures of work environment used in the study. Low satisfaction with leadership, work control, social climate, and particularly the experience of role conflict, correlate most strongly with bullying. The results also show that different work conditions are related to bullying in different organizational settings. Only role conflict shows a partial correlation with bullying in all subsamples. Work conditions account for 10% of the variance in bullying, ranging from 7% to 24% in the different sub-samples. The results show that both the victims of bullying and the observers of bullying report a low-quality work environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Frustration-aggression hypothesis: Examination and reformulation.
Berkowitz, L. (1989) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.106.1.59 · Cited by 2,283
Cited by
Workplace harassment from the victim’s perspective: a theoretical model and meta-analysis.
Bowling, N. A., & Beehr, T. A. (2006) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.998 · Cited by 1,320
The destructiveness of laissez-faire leadership behavior.
Skogstad, A., Einarsen, S., Torsheim, T., Aasland, M. S., & Hetland, H. (2007) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/1076-8998.12.1.80 · Cited by 864
Self-citationOrganisational, work group related and personal causes of mobbing/bullying at work.
Zapf, D. (1999) · International Journal of Manpower · doi:10.1108/01437729910268669 · Cited by 790
Workplace Victimization: Aggression from the Target's Perspective
Aquino, K., & Thau, S. (2009) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163703 · Cited by 731
SPENCE LASCHINGER, H. K., LEITER, M., DAY, A., & GILIN, D. (2009) · Journal of Nursing Management · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2834.2009.00999.x · Cited by 730
Metadata
- Authors
- Einarsen, S., Raknes, B. I., & Matthiesen, S. B.
- Venue
- European Work and Organizational Psychologist
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1994-10
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 381-401
- ISSN
- 0960-2003 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1973121291
- Cited by
- 790
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bullying and harassment at work and their relationships to work environment quality: An exploratory study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13594329408410497
- The paper
- Einarsen, S., Raknes, B. I., & Matthiesen, S. B. (1994). Bullying and harassment at work and their relationships to work environment quality: An exploratory study. European Work and Organizational Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594329408410497
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.