Cited by 61Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorMotivation and Self-Concept in SportsEmployee Performance and Motivation

On the temporal stability of self-determined work motivation profiles: a latent transition analysis

Fernet, Claude, Litalien, David, Morin, Alexandre J.S., Austin, Stéphanie, Gagné, Marylène, Lavoie-Tremblay, Mélanie, Forest, Jacques·2020·European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology

Abstract

This study extends the research and theory on work motivation by examining temporal stability and change in employees’ self-determined work motivation profiles and their differential relations to various predictors and outcomes. We gathered data at two time points over a 24-month period from a sample of 438 newly registered public health care nurses. Results of latent profile and latent transition analyses revealed four distinct profiles (strongly, moderately, self-determined, and poorly motivated), estimated from the position of global and specific behavioural regulations on the motivation continuum proposed by self-determination theory. These profiles were entirely stable at the within-sample level, although within-person changes in profile membership occurred for 30–40% of employees. Of particular interest, perceptions of job resources were consistently associated with greater likelihood of membership in the strongly and moderately motivated profiles. These profiles were also consistently associated with lower emotional exhaustion and intentions to leave the occupation and the organization and with higher in-role performance compared to the self-determined and poorly motivated profiles.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1359432x.2019.1688301

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fernet et al. (2020) was limited to nurses and only considered a limited number of outcomes (emotional exhaustion, in-role performance, and intentions to leave the organization and the occupation), without also considering likely determinants of profile membership.

    “However, this research was limited to nurses, and only considered a limited number of outcomes of these motivation profiles (i.e., emotional exhaustion, in-role performance, and intentions to leave the organization and the occupation), without also considering likely determinants of profile membership.”
  • In these studies, participants' global levels of self-determination tended to be the key component responsible for associations with a variety of covariates.

    “These studies showed that participants' global levels of self-determination tended to be the key component responsible for associations with a variety of covariates, underscoring the importance of considering global levels of self-determination in future research on work motivation.”
  • Recent studies in work and educational areas have demonstrated that bifactor-ESEM makes it possible to simultaneously obtain a direct estimate of employees' global levels of self-determined work motivation and an equally direct estimate of the unique quality associated with each specific regulation.

    “Recent studies conducted in the work (Fernet et al., 2020;Howard et al., 2018) and educational (Litalien, Morin, Gagné et al., 2017) areas have demonstrated that bifactor exploratory structural equation models (bifactor-ESEM; Morin, Arens, & Marsh, 2016) made it possible to simultaneously obtain a direct estimate of employees' global levels of self-determined work motivation and an equally direct”
  • Only one recent study has adopted a comprehensive approach to investigate nurses' motivation profiles.

    “To the best of our knowledge, only one recent study has adopted a similar approach to investigate nurses' motivation profiles (Fernet et al., 2020).”
  • A single study has simultaneously considered global and specific levels of work motivation (using bifactor-ESEM) to identify motivation profiles among newly registered nurses.

    “A single study has simultaneously considered global and specific levels of work motivation (operationalized using bifactor-ESEM; Fernet et al., 2020) to identify motivation profiles among newly registered nurses.”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 89 · Cited by 61

Authors
Fernet, C., Litalien, D., Morin, A. J. S., Austin, S., Gagné, M., Lavoie-Tremblay, M., & Forest, J.
Affiliations
  • Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières (CA)
  • Université Laval (CA)
  • Concordia University (CA)
  • Curtin University (AU)
  • Ingram School of Nursing, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
  • Université du Québec à Montréal (CA)
Corresponding author
Fernet, Claude
Venue
European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
Published
2019-11-06
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
49-63
ISSN
  • 1359-432X (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0643
OpenAlex
W2985957149
Cited by
61
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8
FWCI
11.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Motivation
Keywords
employee motivation, self-determination theory, temporal stability, motivational profiles, behavioral regulation, job resources, emotional exhaustion, turnover intention, in-role performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review