CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 84Teacher Education and AssessmentsStudent Assessment and FeedbackTeacher Education and Leadership Studies

Knowledge, skills, and attitudes of preservice and inservice teachers in educational measurement

Alkharusi, Hussain, Kazem, Ali Mahdi, Al-Musawai, Ali·2011·Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education
DOI 10.1080/1359866x.2011.560649
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Optimal outcomes of the educational assessment of students require that teachers should have adequate knowledge of, strong skills in, and favourable attitudes toward educational measurement. The present study investigated differences between preservice and inservice teachers' knowledge of, perceived skills in, and attitudes toward educational measurement. Participants were 279 preservice teachers and 233 inservice teachers from Oman. Results indicated that inservice teachers had a lower level of knowledge, a higher level of perceived skilfulness, and a more favourable attitude toward educational measurement than preservice teachers. In addition, the results not only testified to the value of preservice measurement training, but also showed the merit of teaching practicum and teaching experience when preparing teachers in educational measurement. Implications for professional preparation in educational measurement as well as recommendations for future research are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1359866x.2011.560649

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Teachers demonstrate higher levels of perceived skillfulness compared to student teachers, whereas student teachers demonstrate higher levels of relevant pedagogical knowledge.

    “For instance, Alkharusi, Kazem, and Al-Musawai (2011) showed that teachers demonstrate higher levels of perceived skillfulness compared to student teachers, whereas student teachers demonstrate higher levels of relevant pedagogical knowledge.”

    From Increasing teachers’ intercultural competences in teacher preparation programs and through professional development: A review (2021) · cites this paper as Alkharusi, Kazem, and Al-Musawai (2011)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Alkharusi, H., Kazem, A. M., & Al-Musawai, A.
Affiliations
Sultan Qaboos University (OM)
Corresponding author
Alkharusi, Hussain
ORCID
Venue
Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2011-04-11
Volume
39
Issue
2
Pages
113-123
ISSN
  • 1359-866X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-2945
DOI
10.1080/1359866x.2011.560649
OpenAlex
W1991498872
Cited by
84
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
16.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Keywords
educational testing, pre-service teachers, in-service teachers, teacher knowledge, perceived skills, attitudes toward assessment, teacher preparation, teaching practicum, teaching experience, Oman

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review