Cited by 4Innovation and Knowledge ManagementInternational Business and FDIBusiness Strategies and Innovation

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; its reference list is not available.

Proactive market orientation towards export performance within SMEs: a comparative study between the US and South Korea

Open access
Yoo, Jin-Woong, Stephens, Aaron Rae, Zhang, Weiwei·2026·Asia Pacific Business Review

Abstract

Drawing on dynamic capabilities (DC) theory, this paper examines the relationships between proactive market orientation (PMO) that captures new knowledge or information for a business market and export performance through exploration innovation (i.e. radical innovation) (EOR) and exploitation innovation (EOI) (i.e. incremental innovation) in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in both the United States (US) and South Korea. As a quantitative research, data sets in each country were collected employing a non-probability sampling approach. For theoretical extension and identifying a crucial construct for export performance, partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) is employed, including multi-group analysis (MGA). This paper has demonstrated that PMO can influence export performance through EOR in combined data, including the US and South Korea. While PMO can affect export performance through EOR in the US, PMO cannot lead to export performance through either EOR or EOI in South Korea. For better export performance, this research proposes that SMEs in the US should keep re-shaping digital business models for EOR attributed to PMO. However, due to reliance on venture capital, both EOR and EOI should be pursued simultaneously for long-term export performance. In contrast, SMEs in South Korea should facilitate business process innovation (i.e. innovating firms) first to enhance export performance.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13602381.2024.2425817

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 67 · Cited by 4

Research works printed but not linked: 66

  1. 10.1177/097324701000600315 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.034 · DOI
  3. 10.1108/IMDS-12-2019-0726 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1108/00251741111183816 · DOI
  5. 10.1177/23197145211020724 · DOI
  6. 10.1080/13602381.2010.535346 · DOI
  7. 10.1108/IMR-05-2022-0106 · DOI
  8. 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120373 · DOI
  10. 10.7880/abas.14.83 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/s40821-015-0030-4 · DOI
  12. 10.1177/0266242620962658 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.clscn.2022.100067 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.03.012 · DOI
  15. 10.1007/s11187-022-00698-3 · DOI
  16. 10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Hair, J. F., M. Sarstedt, C. M. Ringle, and S. P. Gudergan. 2017. Advanced Issues in Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. Los Angeles, USA: Sage Publications.
  18. 10.1080/13602381.2022.2139949 · DOI
  19. 10.1108/IMR-09-2014-0304 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1080/00346764.2013.774190 · DOI
  21. 10.3390/su14116470 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.treng.2021.100083 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.07.002 · DOI
  24. 10.1080/00036840500427262 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/s11365-017-0457-4 · DOI
  26. 10.31387/oscm0510367 · DOI
  27. 10.1080/0965254X.2014.970217 · DOI
  28. 10.1080/13602381.2022.2134966 · DOI
  29. 10.47263/JASEM.2(1)02 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2021.11.002 · DOI
  31. 10.3390/su13158637 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.emj.2022.03.005 · DOI
  33. 10.1177/2158244019832700 · DOI
  34. 10.1108/BJM-04-2019-0143 · DOI
  35. 10.1080/13602381.2022.2140515 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.11.006 · DOI
  37. 10.1007/978-3-319-64069-3_10 · DOI
  38. 10.3390/economies8040079 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1111/j.0737-6782.2004.00086.x · DOI
  40. OECD. 2023. “OECD Reviews of Innovation Policy: Korea 2023.” https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/b07dbdf3-en/index.html?itemId=/content/component/b07dbdf3-en.
  41. 10.1108/APJML-01-2019-0058 · DOI
  42. 10.1177/0275074020941720 · DOI
  43. 10.1080/13602380601016984 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.702 · DOI
  45. 10.1007/978-3-319-71691-6_6 · DOI
  46. 10.1080/13602381.2018.1495381 · DOI
  47. 10.31387/oscm0480326 · DOI
  48. 10.1080/08911762.2021.1894625 · DOI
  49. 10.1080/13602381.2015.1109818 · DOI
  50. 10.1002/mar.21640 · DOI
  51. 10.1080/13602380903522325 · DOI
  52. 10.1080/23311975.2023.2198160 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.06.001 · DOI
  54. 10.3390/su9010108 · DOI
  55. 10.3390/jrfm15050227 · DOI
  56. 10.1007/978-3-319-64069-3_17 · DOI
  57. 10.1108/IJEBR-01-2022-0026 · DOI
  58. 10.1002/smj.640 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.5465/amp.2013.0116 · DOI
  60. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1016/j.jik.2020.09.001 · DOI
  62. 10.1080/1540496X.2020.1785426 · DOI
  63. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.038 · DOI
  64. 10.1080/13602381.2024.2332734 · DOI
  65. 10.1080/13602381.2018.1548545 · DOI
  66. 10.1287/orsc.13.3.339.2780 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Yoo, J.-W., Stephens, A. R., & Zhang, W.
Affiliations
  • University of Hertfordshire (GB)
  • Hartwick College (US)
Corresponding author
Stephens, Aaron Rae
Venue
Asia Pacific Business Review
Published
2024-11-13
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
433-455
ISSN
  • 1360-2381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-792X
OpenAlex
W4404335757
Cited by
4
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Asia Pacific Business Review (publishedVersion)
  • University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Business and FDI
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Innovation
Keywords
proactive market orientation, export performance, small and medium-sized enterprises, dynamic capabilities, radical innovation, incremental innovation, business process innovation, digital business models, venture capital, cross-national comparison, United States, South Korea

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proactive market orientation towards export performance within SMEs: a comparative study between the US and South Korea. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13602381.2024.2425817
The paper
Yoo, J.-W., Stephens, A. R., & Zhang, W. (2026). Proactive market orientation towards export performance within SMEs: a comparative study between the US and South Korea. Asia Pacific Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2024.2425817