Cited by 217COVID-19 and Mental HealthPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionAging and Gerontology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome) pandemic in Hong Kong: Effects on the subjective wellbeing of elderly and younger people

Open access

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the impact of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) outbreak in Hong Kong in 2003, on the subjective wellbeing (SWB) of elderly people and a younger comparative sample. The Personal Wellbeing Index (PWI), a contemporary instrument employed to measure SWB, was also examined for its psychometric performance to substantiate its use. METHOD: A total of 302 older adults (age 65 + years) and 158 younger adults (age 35-46 years) were recruited from different districts. Data were collected by individual face-to-face interviews. RESULT: While elderly people living in severely infected districts showed significantly lower levels of SWB, these levels and those of the younger sample were found to remain within the normative range. A major mitigating factor was an increased sense of community-connectedness. Other characteristics linked to low wellbeing levels included chronic illness, female gender, low education and unemployment. The living districts, characterized by varying extents of infection, had stronger associations with SWB than participants' age. The PWI demonstrated good psychometric performance and also more robustness with elderly people, including its sensitivity to the sense of population threat. CONCLUSION: Psychological resilience was identified among both the elderly and younger age-groups in Hong Kong during the SARS pandemic. The PWI is verified as a suitable instrument for SWB measurements.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13607860802380607

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Cheng C, 2003, Report on the public responses to the SARS outbreak in Hong Kong
  2. Chi I, 1993, American Asian Review, 11, 28
  3. Chui EWT, 1999, The Hong Kong Journal of Gerontology, 13, 32
  4. Cummins RA, 2003, Australian Unity Wellbeing Index: Report 7.0 – the wellbeing of Australians – the effects of work.
  5. Cummins RA, 2004, Australian unity wellbeing index: Cumulative psychometric record.
  6. Cummins RA, 2006, Australian unity wellbeing index: Cumulative psychometric record
  7. Cummins RA, 2002, Australian unity wellbeing index: Report 3.1. Wellbeing in Australia and the aftermath of September 11.
  8. Cummins RA, Handbook of social indicators and quality-of-life studies. Volume I: Theoretical and methodological foundations
  9. Cummins RA, 2007, Australian unity wellbeing index: Report 16.1: The wellbeing of Australians – Groups with the highest and lowest wellbeing in Australia.
  10. Cummins RA, 2007, Australian Unity Wellbeing Index: Report 17.0. The wellbeing of Australians – Work, wealth and happiness.
  11. Donnelly CA, 2003, The Lancet
  12. 2005, Personal Wellbeing Index .
  13. Ngan R, 1997, The Hong Kong Journal of Gerontology, 11, 22
  14. Pallant J, 2001, SPSS survival guide
  15. Whitfield R, 2007, Macau quality of life: Report 4 – survey 4, 4th quarter 2007

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–217 of 217

Metadata

Authors
Lau, A. L. D., Chi, I., Cummins, R. A., Lee, T. M. C., Chou, K.-L., & Chung, L. W. M.
Affiliations
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Lau, Anna L.D.
Venue
Aging & Mental Health
Published
2008-11
Volume
12
Issue
6
Pages
746-760
ISSN
  • 1360-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-6915
OpenAlex
W2169004216
Cited by
217
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 41 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Aging & Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
SARS epidemic, subjective well-being, older adults, young adults, Personal Wellbeing Index, psychometric validation, community ties, psychological resilience, chronic disease, unemployment, gender differences, educational attainment, Hong Kong
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude to Health, Disease Outbreaks, Educational Status, Female, Hong Kong, Humans, Male, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Sensitivity and Specificity, Socioeconomic Factors, Multivariate Analysis, Communicable Diseases, Emerging, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome, Resilience, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review