Cited by 12Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesNursing care and research

Quality of in-home care, long-term care placement, and the survival of persons with dementia

McClendon, McKee J., Smyth, Kathleen A.·2015·Aging & Mental Health

Abstract

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Caregivers of persons with dementia living at home adopt a variety of caregiving styles that vary in quality. Three styles of high-quality care and poor-quality care have been identified. The outcomes, however, of varying styles of caregiving are unknown. Our purpose was to investigate the linkage of quality of care to long-term care placement and survival. DESIGN AND METHODS: We used a sample of 148 primary caregivers of a relative living at home and needing assistance due to memory or thinking problems. We used items from four existing scales and five new items to construct measures of high-quality and poor-quality care. Long-term care and survival were determined from two follow-ups. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the relationship of quality of care to long-term care placement and survival. RESULTS: Poor quality of care increased the risk of long-term care placement, as expected, but high-quality care was not related to placement. Surprisingly, high-quality care increased the risk of death while poor-quality care decreased the risk. Secondary results were: wishful/intrapsychic coping (a dysfunctional type of emotion-focused coping) and long-term care placement shortened the survival; and caregiver personality traits of neuroticism and agreeableness lengthened the survival. IMPLICATIONS: It is premature to recommend caregiver interventions based on our unexpected findings. Further studies are vital and should include care-recipient impairments and the quality of life of the person with dementia as additional outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13607863.2014.1003284

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McClendon, M. J., & Smyth, K. A.
Affiliations
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
  • University Hospitals of Cleveland (US)
Corresponding author
McClendon, McKee J.
Venue
Aging & Mental Health
Published
2015-01-29
Volume
19
Issue
12
Pages
1093-1102
ISSN
  • 1360-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-6915
OpenAlex
W2155164654
Cited by
12
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Aging & Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Alzheimer's Association (IIRG-08-91014, 11/1/2008–10/31/2011)
  • University Hospitals of Cleveland Case Medical Center
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
Keywords
dementia, home care, quality of care, long-term care placement, survival, primary caregivers, emotion-focused coping, neuroticism, agreeableness, personality traits, caregiver interventions
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Dementia, Female, Home Nursing, Humans, Long-Term Care, Male, Nursing Homes, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Quality of Life, Stress, Psychological, Time Factors, Proportional Hazards Models, Survival Analysis, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review