Cited by 617Geriatric Care and Nursing HomesDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

Predictors of nursing home admission for persons with dementia

Gaugler, Joseph E., Yu, Fang, Krichbaum, Kathleen, Wyman, Jean F.·2009·Medical Care

Abstract

Objective The objective of this systematic review was to identify factors that consistently predict nursing home admission (NHA) in persons with dementia. Methods Studies published in English were retrieved by searching the MEDLINE (1966-2006), PSYCINFO (1950-2006), CINAHL (1982-2006), and Digital Dissertations (1950-2006) databases. Bibliographies of retrieved studies were also searched. Information on study characteristics and empirical results were extracted using a standardized protocol. Results Of 782 relevant studies identified 80 were selected for review based upon eligibility criteria. The most consistent predictors of NHA in persons with dementia included severity of cognitive impairment, Alzheimer disease diagnosis, basic activity of daily living dependencies, behavioral symptoms, and depression. Caregivers who indicated greater emotional stress, a desire to institutionalize the care recipient, and feelings of being "trapped" in care responsibilities were more likely to admit persons with dementia to nursing homes. Demographic variables, incontinence, and service use did not consistently predict NHA. Conclusions Several results seemed to challenge conventional assumptions of what precipitates NHA among persons with dementia. Caregiver stressors in conjunction with care recipient characteristics are important to consider when assessing NHA risk. The findings emphasize the need to construct more complex models of institutionalization when designing risk measures to ta…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mlr.0b013e31818457ce

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gaugler, J. E., Yu, F., Krichbaum, K., & Wyman, J. F.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Gaugler, Joseph E.
Venue
Medical Care
Published
2009-02
Volume
47
Issue
2
Pages
191-198
ISSN
0025-7079 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1979728352
Cited by
617
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 32
FWCI
5.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Research Resources (M01RR000400)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
nursing home admission, dementia, predictors of institutionalization, caregiver stress, caregiver burden, Alzheimer's disease, cognitive impairment severity, activities of daily living, behavioral symptoms, depression, incontinence, risk assessment, long-term care
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Cognition Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Homes for the Aged, Humans, Nursing Homes, Patient Admission, United States, Caregivers, Cost of Illness, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review