Competition in a Populist Authoritarian Regime: The June 2018 Dual Elections in Turkey
Abstract
This article examines the June 2018 presidential and parliamentary elections in Turkey. I maintain that Turkey’s populist authoritarian regime context simultaneously hyperpoliticised and depoliticised the electoral process, as this regime decreased the uncertainty of electoral outcomes and yet the ballot box became the singular legitimate political arena to challenge it. I begin the paper with a discussion of the political context of the elections: political regime dynamics, the new hyperpresidential system, as well as the electoral rules and voting behaviour. I then scrutinise the electoral campaign strategies of the major parties and candidates with an emphasis on the strategies of the opposition in counteracting the uneven playing field. Finally, I analyse the electoral results and discuss their implications.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The CHP campaign manual 'The Book of Radical Love' focused on defusing polarization through cross-cutting axes and responding to hate with love.
“Perhaps the most notable innovation was the CHP campaign manual called 'The Book of Radical Love'. The strategy was focused on defusing polarization through new and cross-cutting axes of politics, and responding to the politics of hate and resentment with 'love'.”
From Pernicious polarization, autocratization and opposition strategies (2021) · cites this paper as [45]
Cites
A third wave of autocratization is here: what is new about it?
Lührmann, A., & Lindberg, S. I. (2019) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2019.1582029 · Cited by 1,528 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…incumbents and suffocating the opposition.1 As delineated below, Turkey’s recent and continuous authoritarian slide2 or its protracted ‘autocratisation’ (Lührmann & Lindberg 2019) occurred through ‘executive aggrandisement’ (Bermeo 2016) by a populist party which claimed that increasing the…”
BackgroundMethod
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pernicious polarization, autocratization and opposition strategies
Somer, M., McCoy, J. L., & Luke, R. E. (2021) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2020.1865316 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sözen, Y.
- Affiliations
- Le Moyne College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sözen, Yunus
- ORCID
- Sözen, Yunus
- Venue
- South European Society and Politics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-07-03
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 287-315
- ISSN
- 1360-8746 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-9612
- OpenAlex
- W2989607320
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5
- FWCI
- 25.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- South European Society & Politics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- eResearch@Ozyegin (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Turkey's Politics and Society
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Keywords
- 2018 Turkish general election, 2018 Turkish presidential election, authoritarian populism, hyperpresidentialism, electoral competition, depoliticization, electoral campaign strategy, opposition parties, electoral rules, voting behavior, Turkey
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review