Cited by 35Education Discipline and InequalityYouth Substance Use and School AttendanceInclusive Education and Diversity

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

‘Factors associated with high and low levels of school exclusions: comparing the English and wider UK experience’

Open access
Cole, Ted, McCluskey, Gillean, Daniels, Harry, Thompson, Ian, Tawell, Alice·2019·Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties

Abstract

This article draws on findings from the first cross-national study of school exclusions in the four jurisdictions of the UK. It sketches factors associated with the past research with reductions in exclusions. It then reports interview data gathered in England in 2018 from five specialist officers working in two Local Authorities and a senior officer working for a national voluntary organisation. The officers describe good practice but also national, local and school level developments contributing to a deteriorating situation. These developments include unhelpful government guidance and regulations; school accountability frameworks affecting curriculum and leading to the neglect of Special Educational Needs; loss of Local Authority powers and funding resulting in reductions in support services. Data gathered for this study in other UK jurisdictions suggests that in Scotland and Northern Ireland, and to a lesser extent in Wales, a practice that avoids school exclusions has persisted more than in England.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13632752.2019.1628340

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The rate of temporary exclusion in Scotland has been consistently decreasing since 2007.

    “the rate of temporary exclusion has been consistently decreasing since 2007”

    From 'Alternative' education provision: a mapping and critique (2024) · cites this paper as Cole et al., 2019

    The available indexed passages are bibliographic information and a link to an accepted manuscript; they do not give exclusion rates or a trend. Searches for Scotland, temporary exclusions, and 2007 found no passage establishing whether the rate has consistently decreased since 2007. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Permanent exclusion in Scotland has been all but eradicated, with one young person permanently excluded in 2022/23.

    “Permanent exclusion in Scotland has been all but eradicated, with one young person permanently excluded in 2022/23”

    From 'Alternative' education provision: a mapping and critique (2024) · cites this paper as Cole et al., 2019

    The available copy contains bibliographic information and an accepted-manuscript link (Abstract; 1 Article), but no passage reporting Scottish permanent-exclusion figures. Searches for permanent exclusions in Scotland, “2022/23,” and “all but eradicated” found no support for the claim that one young person was permanently excluded in 2022/23. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. Andrews, J. 2017. The Introduction of Progress 8. London: Educational Policy Institute. Accessed 25 April 2019. https://epi.org.uk/publications-and-research/analysis-introduction-progress-8/
  2. Andrews, J., and T. Lawrence. 2018. School Funding Pressures in England. Education Policy Institute. Accessed 17 March 2018. https://epi.org.uk
  3. Apter, S. 1982. Troubled Children, Troubled Systems. New York: Pergamon.
  4. 10.1037/e667892007-001 · DOI
  5. Clough, P., P. Garner, T. Pardeck, and F. Yuen. eds. 2005. Handbook of Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties. London: Sage.
  6. Cole, T. 2015. Mental Health Difficulties and Children at Risk of Exclusion from Schools in England: A Review from an Educational Perspective of Policy, Practice and Research, 1997 to 2015. Oxford: University of Oxford.
  7. Cole, T., and B. Knowles. 2011. How to Help Children and Young People with Complex Behaviour Difficulties: A Guide for Practitioners in Educational Settings. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
  8. 10.1080/0305498032000080675 · DOI
  9. Cole, T., H. Daniels, and J. Visser, Eds. 2013. The Routledge International Companion to Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties. London: Routledge.
  10. Cole, T., and J. Visser. 2005. Young People Who Present Challenging Behaviour - a Literature Review, Commissioned by Ofsted (2005). Birmingham: University of Birmingham.
  11. Cole, T., J. Visser, and G. Upton. 1998. Effective Schooling for Pupils with Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties. London: David Fulton Publishers.
  12. 10.1177/1753193412443661 · DOI
  13. Cooper, P., C. Smith, and G. Upton. 1994. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties: Theory to Practice. London: Routledge.
  14. Cooper, P., M. Drummond, S. Hart, J. Lovey, and C. McLaughlin. 2000. Positive Alternatives to Exclusion. London: Routledge Falmer.
  15. 10.1080/0266736000150402 · DOI
  16. 10.3389/feduc.2019.00036 · DOI
  17. 10.1080/08856251003658652 · DOI
  18. Daniels, H., T. Cole, E. Sellman, J. Sutton, J. Visser, and J. Bedward. 2003. Study of Young People Permanently Excluded from School. London: DfES.
  19. Department for Children, Schools and Families. 2007. Social and Emotional Aspects of Learning for Secondary Schools. London: DSCF.
  20. Department for Children, Schools and Families. 2009. Promoting and Supporting Positive Behaviour in Primary Schools: Developing Social and Emotional Aspects of Learning (SEAL). London: DCSF.
  21. Department for Children, Schools and Families/Department of Health. 2008. With children and young people in mind: the final report of the National CAMHS review. London: DCSF/DoH.
  22. Department for Education. 1994a. Pupil Behaviour and Discipline. Circular 8/94. London: DFE.
  23. Department for Education. 1994b. The Education of Children with Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties. Circular 9/94. London: DFE.
  24. Department for Education. 1994c. Exclusions from School. Circular 10/94. London:: DFE.
  25. Department for Education. 1994d. The Education by LEAs of Children Otherwise than at School. Circular 11/94. London: DFE.
  26. Department for Education. 2011. Behaviour and Discipline in Schools: A Guide for Headteachers and Schools Staff. London: DFE.
  27. Department for Education and Skills. 2003a. Key Stage 3 National Strategy: Key Messages, Behaviour and Attendance Strand. Ref: 0391/2003. London: DfES.
  28. Department for Education and Skills/Department of Health. 2004. Promoting Emotional Health and Wellbeing the National Healthy Schools Standard. Wetherby: Health Development Agency.
  29. Department of Education and Science.1989. Discipline in Schools: Report of the committee of enquiry chaired by Lord Elton. London: HMSO.
  30. Garner P. 2013. “Teacher Education: Dilemmas and Tensions for School Staff Working with EBD.” In The Routledge International Companion to Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties edited by T. Cole H. Daniels and J. Visser 330–339. London: Routledge.
  31. Gray, P., A. Miller, and J. Noakes, eds. 1994. Challenging Behaviour in Schools: Teacher Support, Practical Techniques and Policy Development. London: Routledge.
  32. Hallam, S., and L. Rogers. 2008. Improving Behaviour and Attendance at School. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  33. Hancock R. 2013. “The Pastoral Pedagogy of Teaching Assistants.” In The Routledge International Companion to Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties edited by T. Cole H. Daniels and J. Visser 296–302. London: Routledge.
  34. Joseph Rowntree Foundation. 2015. The Cost of Cuts: The Impact on Local Government and Poorer Communities. York: JRF.
  35. 10.1007/978-3-319-16889-0 · DOI
  36. 10.53841/bpsecp.2010.27.3.100 · DOI
  37. 10.1007/978-3-319-71559-9_29 · DOI
  38. McCluskey, G., T. Cole, H. Daniels, I. Thompson, and A. Tawell. forthcoming. “Exclusion in School in the UK: Is Scotland Different?” British Journal of Educational Research.
  39. 10.4135/9781446219478 · DOI
  40. National Assembly for Wales. 2006. Inclusion and Pupil Support Guidance Circular No: 47/2006 Cardiff. Cardiff: National Assembly for Wales.
  41. Office of the Children’s Commissioner. 2012. ‘They Never Give up on You’: School Exclusions Enquiry. London: OCC.
  42. Ofsted. 1999. Principles into Practice: Effective Education of Pupils with EBD. London: Ofsted.
  43. Ofsted. 2005. Managing Challenging Behaviour. London: Ofsted.
  44. Ofsted. 2009. The Exclusion from School of Children Aged Four to Seven. London: Ofsted.
  45. Parsons, C. 2009. Strategic Alternatives to Exclusion from School. Sydney: Trentham Books.
  46. Porter, L. 2013. “Applied Behaviour Analysis: Its Applications and Limitations.” In Chapter 13, edited by D. Cole and Visser, 112–121. London: Routledge.
  47. Porter, L. 2014. A Comprehensive Guide to Classroom Management: Facilitating Engagement and Learning in Schools. Crows Nest, MD: Allen and Unwin.
  48. Scottish Government. 2017. Included, Engaged and Involved Part 2: A Positive Approach to Preventing and Managing School Exclusions. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
  49. Welsh Government. 2015. Exclusion from Schools and Pupil Referral Units. Cardiff: Welsh Government.
  50. 10.1177/0143034313517451 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • 'Alternative' education provision: a mapping and critique

    Taylor, A., & McCluskey, G. (2024) · Oxford Review of Education · doi:10.1080/03054985.2024.2373067 · Cited by 7

    “Exclusion figures in Scotland suggest that formal permanent exclusions have been all but eradicated in recent years, and temporary exclusions are consistently decreasing (Cole et al., 2019; Daniels et al., 2022; Duffy et al., 2021; Scottish Government, 2022c).”
    Self-citation

Metadata

Authors
Cole, T., McCluskey, G., Daniels, H., Thompson, I., & Tawell, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
Cole, Ted
Venue
Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties
Published
2019-06-14
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
374-390
ISSN
  • 1363-2752 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2692
OpenAlex
W2951444347
Cited by
35
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
8.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Education › Youth Substance Use and School Attendance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Inclusive Education and Diversity
Keywords
school exclusion, cross-national comparison, England, Scotland, Northern Ireland, Wales, local government powers, school accountability, special educational needs, school support services, student behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review