Cited by 30

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Toward the Archaeontology of the dead body

Domanska, Ewa·2005·Rethinking History

Abstract

The postmodern breakthrough revealed the limitations of history understood as the dominant approach to the past, but it does not follow that history should be abandoned. We might wish, rather, to try to seek an alternative to history, or at least a supplement to it. The search for such an alternative could begin on the border between archaeology and history, where the status of material culture and historical sources can be investigated. Contemporary Heideggerian or contemplative archaeology suggests the possibility of abandoning textualism and turning to questions of the past's materiality. For the historian, the Heideggeran approach encourages the rethinking of the historical source, considered as the trace-being and trace-Being, as well as changing the repertoire of questions. As a case in point, I reflect on the dead body and various aspects of its existence. Analyzing the case of the Argentinian desaparecidos, I discuss the dead body as evidence of crime, as an object of mourning (trace-being), and as the absent remains which refer to the unpresentable ‘absolute past’ (trace-Being). I situate the dead body's existence in the space of the non-absent past, whose ambivalent and liminal status protects it against the all-encompassing discourses of the living. In the context of those considerations, prompted by Heideggerian archaeology, I try to demonstrate that thinking in terms of the non-absent past and turning to the issue of ‘the ontology of the ashes’ may open up the po…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13642520500307602

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The current situation proves that the Spanish Civil War was never gone; it was a non-absent past.

    “At any rate, the current situation proves that the war was never gone: it was a non-absent past:”

    From Making things public: Archaeologies of the Spanish Civil War (2007) · cites this paper as Domanska 2005

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 61

  1. Agamben G., 1998, The Coming Community
  2. Agosin M., 1990, The Mothers of Plaza de Mayo (Linea Fundadora). The Story of Renée Epelbaum 1976 – 1985
  3. Arditti R., 1999, Searching for Life: The Grandmothers of the Plaza de Mayo and the Disappeared Children of Argentina, 10.1525/9780520921665 · DOI
  4. Aristotle, 1983, Aristotle's Physics: Book III and IV
  5. Ashmore W., 1999, Archaeologies of Landscape: Contemporary Perspectives
  6. Bataille G., 1986, Erotism: Death and Sensuality
  7. Belk R. W., 1995, Collecting in a Consumer Society
  8. Bouvard M. G., 1994, Revolutionizing Motherhood: The Mothers of the Plaza de Mayo
  9. Buchli V., 2001, Archaeologies of the Contemporary Past
  10. Chapman R., 1981, The Archaeology of Death
  11. 10.1017/S1380203800001707 · DOI
  12. Derrida J., 1976, Of Grammatology
  13. Derrida J., 1991, Cinders/Feu la cendre
  14. Derrida J., 1993, Aporias
  15. Derrida J., 1995, On the Name, 89, 10.1515/9781503615823-004 · DOI
  16. Fisher J., 1989, Mothers of the Disappeared
  17. Foucault M., 1977, Language, Counter-Memory, Practice. Selected Essays and Interviews, 139
  18. Freud S., 1953, Collected Papers, 368
  19. Gazin-Schwartz A., 1999, Archaeology and Folklore
  20. Goodwin S. W., 1993, Death and Representation
  21. Gosden C., 1994, Social Being and Time
  22. Graziano F., 1992, Divine Violence: Spectacle, Psychosexuality, and Radical Christianity in the Argentine ‘Dirty War’
  23. Greimas A. J., 1966, Structural Semantics
  24. 10.2307/464872 · DOI
  25. Greimas A. J., 1987, On Meaning: Selected Writings in Semiotic Theory
  26. Greimas A. J., 1993, The Semiotic of Passions. From States of Affairs to States of Feeling
  27. Harrison R. P., 2003, The Dominion of the Dead, 10.7208/chicago/9780226317922.001.0001 · DOI
  28. Haynes D. J., 1997, The Vocation of the Artist
  29. Hegel G. W.F., 1991, The Philosophy of History
  30. Heidegger M., 2000, Introduction to Metaphysics
  31. Hernández A., 1997, Pedagogy, Democracy, and Feminism. Rethinking the Public Sphere, 61
  32. Iggers G. G., 2000, Proceedings, 19th International Congress of Historical Sciences, 83
  33. Jameson F., 1981, The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act
  34. Joyce C., 1991, Witnesses from the Grave: The Stories Bones Tell
  35. 10.1017/S1380203800000945 · DOI
  36. Karlsson H., 2000, Philosophy and Archaeological Practice: Perspectives for the 21st Century, 69
  37. 10.1525/rep.2000.69.1.01p0064y · DOI
  38. Krishenblatt-Gimblett B., 1998, Destination Culture: Tourism, Museums, and Heritage
  39. Kristeva J., 1984, Revolution in Poetic Language
  40. LaCapra D., 1998, History and Memory after Auschwitz, 180, 10.7591/9781501727450 · DOI
  41. 10.1080/000713100358453 · DOI
  42. 10.1086/421123 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Marchitello H., 2001, What Happens to History. The Renewal of Ethics in Contemporary Thought
  44. 10.4324/9780203259320 · DOI
  45. Nisbet R., 1973, The Historian Between the Ethnologist and the Futurologist, 105, 10.1515/9783111532431-009 · DOI
  46. 1984, Nunca más: Informe de la Comisión Nacional sobre la Desaparición de Personas
  47. Pearce S. M., 1992, Museums, Objects and Collections: A Cultural Study
  48. Pearson M. P., 1999, The Archaeology of Death and Burial
  49. Pearson M. P., 2001, Theatre/Archaeology
  50. Plato, 1957, Plato's Cosmology
  51. Rorty R., 1999, Philosophy and Social Hope
  52. Stover E., 1998, The Grave: Srebrenica and Vukovar
  53. Thomas J., 1996, Time, Culture and Identity: An Interpretive Archaeology
  54. 10.1017/S1380203800000957 · DOI
  55. Thomas L. -V., 1980, Le cadavre. De la biologie a l'anthropologie
  56. Tilley C., 1989, Antiquity, 63, 275, 10.1017/S0003598X00075992 · DOI
  57. Tilley C., 1999, Metaphor and Material Culture
  58. 1996. ‘Towards a Heideggerian archaeology?’.Archaeological Dialogues, vol. 3, no. 1 and vol. 4, no. 1.
  59. Vasić M., 2001, Gazeta Wyborcza, 6
  60. Verdery K., 1999, The Political Lives of Dead Bodies: Reburial and Postsocialist Change
  61. 10.4324/9780203320570 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Domanska, E.
Venue
Rethinking History
Published
2005-12
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
389-413
ISSN
  • 1364-2529
  • 1470-1154
Cited by
30
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review