The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Management of Confidentiality and Anonymity in Social Research
Abstract
This article explores the ways in which social researchers manage issues of confidentiality and the contexts in which deliberate and accidental disclosures occur. The data are drawn from a qualitative study of social researchers’ practices in relation to informed consent. It comprised 31 individual interviews and six focus groups as well as invited email responses with researchers working with vulnerable groups or with an interest in research ethics. Researchers reported feeling compelled to break confidentiality when participants were perceived as being at risk of harm but not in cases of involvement in illegal activity. Situations in which accidental disclosures occurred were also identified. Researchers reported varying ways in which they protected the confidentiality of their participants in the dissemination of their research, including omitting data and changing key characteristics of participants. The implications of researchers’ practices on data integrity and relationships with participants are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1997) · Cited by 4,204
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-2286 · Cited by 2,565
Doing Research on Sensitive Topics
McCarthy, W., & Lee, R. M. (1995) · Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie · doi:10.2307/3341018 · Cited by 1,124
Doing research on sensitive topics
Shaw, D. (1994) · Library & Information Science Research · doi:10.1016/0740-8188(94)90018-3 · Cited by 660
Doing research with children and young people
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-5394 · Cited by 510
The Anonymity of Research Participants: Assumptions, Ethics, and Practicalities
Grinyer, A. (2009) · Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) · Cited by 215
DANGER IN THE FIELD: Risk and ethics in social research
(2000) · Taylor & Francis eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203190340 · Cited by 207
The Reality of Research with Children and Young People
LEWIS, V. A., Kellett, M., Robinson, C., Fraser, S., & Ding, S. (2003) · Open Research Online (The Open University) · Cited by 200
Walking the Tightrope: Ethical Issues for Qualitative Researchers
(2002) · University of Toronto Press eBooks · doi:10.3138/9781442683204 · Cited by 172
Researching researchers: lessons for research ethics
Wiles, R., Charles, V., Crow, G., & Heath, S. (2006) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/1468794106065004 · Cited by 159
Self-citation
Cited by
A rose by any other name: participants choosing research pseudonyms
Allen, R. E. S., & Wiles, J. L. (2016) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1080/14780887.2015.1133746 · Cited by 298
Introduction: The Politics of Anonymity and Confidentiality
Macleod, C. I., & Mnyaka, P. (2018) · The Palgrave Handbook of Ethics in Critical Research · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-74721-7_15 · Cited by 6
Volunteerism and Cultural Competence: A Qualitative Study of Tzu Chi’s Immigrant Healthcare Model
Chen, I.-C., & Phanumartwiwath, A. (2025) · Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health · doi:10.1007/s10903-025-01741-7 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Wiles, R., Crow, G., Heath, S., & Charles, V.
- Venue
- International Journal of Social Research Methodology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 417-428
- ISSN
- 1364-5579 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5300
- OpenAlex
- W2127586363
- Cited by
- 473
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 20.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Management of Confidentiality and Anonymity in Social Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13645570701622231
- The paper
- Wiles, R., Crow, G., Heath, S., & Charles, V. (2008). The Management of Confidentiality and Anonymity in Social Research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570701622231
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.