The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Walking the Tightrope: Ethical Issues for Qualitative Researchers
Abstract
Are formal ethics research guidelines congruent with the aims and methodology of inductive and qualitative social research? Using the experiences of 16 Canadian, American, and British researchers, this collection explores answers to the question.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ethics Creep: Governing Social Science Research in the Name of Ethics
Haggerty, K. D. (2004) · Qualitative Sociology · doi:10.1023/b:quas.0000049239.15922.a3 · Cited by 640
The Management of Confidentiality and Anonymity in Social Research
Wiles, R., Crow, G., Heath, S., & Charles, V. (2008) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/13645570701622231 · Cited by 473
Greene, M. (2014) · The Qualitative Report · doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2014.1106 · Cited by 471
Moving the participation agenda forward
Hill, M., Davis, J., Prout, A., & Tisdall, K. (2004) · Children & Society · doi:10.1002/chi.819 · Cited by 465
Informed consent, anticipatory regulation and ethnographic practice
Murphy, E., & Dingwall, R. (2007) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.08.008 · Cited by 274
Metadata
- Venue
- University of Toronto Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of Toronto Press
- Published
- 2002-01-01
- OpenAlex
- W1494669194
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.33
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Walking the Tightrope: Ethical Issues for Qualitative Researchers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3138/9781442683204
- The paper
- Walking the Tightrope: Ethical Issues for Qualitative Researchers. (2002). University of Toronto Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442683204
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
