Cited by 506

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An efficient method for identifying and filling surface depressions in digital elevation models for hydrologic analysis and modelling

Wang, L., Liu, H.·2006·International Journal of Geographical Information Science

Abstract

Identification and removal of surface depressions is a critical step for automated modelling of surface rainfall runoff based on Digital Elevation Models (DEMs). At present, nearly all GIS and hydrologic software packages employ Jenson and Domingue's method for preparing depressionless DEMs for hydrologic analysis. This conventional method is computationally intensive and time‐consuming. With the growing availability of high‐resolution DEMs produced by airborne LIDAR and InSAR techniques, GIS‐based hydrologic applications often need to handle larger geographic areas at finer resolutions. In the face of high‐resolution DEMs, the conventional method becomes inadequate and deficient. In this paper, we present a new method for efficiently identifying and filling surface depressions in DEMs. This method can simultaneously determine flow paths and spatial partition of watersheds with one pass of processing. A novel concept of spill elevation and the least‐cost search for optimal flow paths are the two cornerstones of our method. The time complexity of our method is in O(Nlog N). It has been implemented using C++ programming language and successfully applied to USGS DEMs and LIDAR DEMs of various sizes. Experiments show that our method outperforms the conventional method by a factor of over 30, in terms of running time.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13658810500433453

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The DEMs were corrected for unrealistic geomorphology introduced by adding the random error field using a sink fill algorithm that removes surface depressions.

    “The DEMs were then corrected for unrealistic geomorphology that might have been introduced when adding the random error field (Temme et al., 2009, p. 131).This was achieved through the use of a sink fill algorithm, which removes surface depressions in DEMs (Choi, 2018;Wang & Liu, 2006).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. 10.1029/WR022i001p00015 · DOI
  2. Band L. E., 1999, Geographical Information Systems Volume 1: Principles and Technical Issues, 527
  3. 10.1029/2002WR001754 · DOI
  4. Cormen T. H., 1996, Introduction to Algorithms
  5. Dechter R., 1988, Search in Artificial Intelligence, 166, 10.1007/978-1-4613-8788-6_5 · DOI
  6. 1994, Cell‐Based Modeling with GRID
  7. 1999, Technical Documentation of ArcInfo, version 8.0.1
  8. 10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03138-1 · DOI
  9. Garbrecht J., 2000, Hydrologic and Hydraulic Modeling Support with Geographic Information Systems, 1
  10. 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1987.tb00158.x · DOI
  11. 2002, Off the Charts: Tropical Storm Allison Public Report, Tropical Storm Allison Recovery Project
  12. 10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00114-1 · DOI
  13. Hutchinson M. F., 1988, Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, 117
  14. 10.1016/0022-1694(89)90073-5 · DOI
  15. Jenson S. K., 1988, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 54, 1593
  16. 10.1080/13658810050024278 · DOI
  17. 10.1029/98WR00094 · DOI
  18. Mark D. M., 1983, Cartographica, 21, 168, 10.3138/10LM-4435-6310-251R · DOI
  19. Marks D., 1984, Geo‐Processing, 2, 299
  20. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199805)12:6<843::AID-HYP658>3.0.CO;2-R · DOI
  21. 10.1002/hyp.3360050103 · DOI
  22. Moore I. D., 1993, Environmental Modeling with GIS, 196
  23. 10.1016/S0734-189X(84)80011-0 · DOI
  24. Oliver F., 2000, Hydrologic and Hydraulic Modeling Support with Geographic Information Systems, 85
  25. Peckham, S. 1995. “Self‐similarity in the geometry and dynamics of large river basins.”. PhD thesis, University of Colorado
  26. 10.1016/S0341-8162(01)00164-3 · DOI
  27. Sedgewick R., 2002, Algorithms in C++: Part 5 Graph Algorithms
  28. Srinivasan R., 1991, Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 7, 779, 10.13031/2013.26302 · DOI
  29. 10.1029/96WR03137 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1002/hyp.3360050107 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/0022-1694(92)90206-B · DOI
  32. 2002, Geospatial Hydrologic Modeling Extension HEC‐GeoHMS User's Manual Version 1.0

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wang, L., & Liu, H.
Venue
International Journal of Geographical Information Science
Published
2006-02
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
193-213
ISSN
  • 1365-8816
  • 1362-3087
Cited by
506
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review