The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Safe separation distance score: a new metric for evaluating wildland firefighter safety zones using lidar
Abstract
Safety zones are areas where firefighters can retreat to in order to avoid bodily harm when threatened by burnover or entrapment from wildland fire. At present, safety zones are primarily designated by firefighting personnel as part of daily fire management activities. Though critical to safety zone assessment, the effectiveness of this approach is inherently limited by the individual firefighter’s or crew boss’s ability to accurately and consistently interpret vegetation conditions, topography, and spatial characteristics of potential safety zones (e.g. area and geometry of a forest clearing). In order to facilitate the safety zone identification and characterization process, this study introduces a new metric for safety zone evaluation: the Safe Separation Distance Score (SSDS). The SSDS is a numerical representation of the relative suitability of a given area as a safety zone according to its size, geometry, and surrounding vegetation height. This paper describes an algorithm for calculating pixel-based and polygon-based SSDS from lidar data. SSDS is calculated for every potential safety zone within a lidar dataset covering Tahoe National Forest, California, USA. A total of 2367 potential safety zones with an SSDS ≥1 were mapped, representing areas that are suitable for fires burning in low wind and low slope conditions. The highest SSDS calculated within the study area was 9.65, a score that represents suitability in the highest wind-steepest slope conditions. Potential s…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Escape routes are of little use unless they direct fire crews towards suitable safety zones, which can be geospatially identified and evaluated.
“However, escape routes are of little use unless they direct fire crews towards suitable safety zones, which can be geospatially identified and evaluated [27,28].”
From Modeling wildland firefighter travel rates by terrain slope: results from GPS-tracking of type 1 crew movement (2020) · cites this paper as [27]
Campbell, Dennison, and Butler (2017) assumed that vegetation density has a linear relationship with travel rate.
“For example, Campbell, Dennison, and Butler (2017) assumed that vegetation density has linear relationship with travel rate.”
From Machine learning estimation of off-trail pedestrian travel rates using LiDAR-derived slope, vegetation, and surface roughness (2026) · cites this paper as Campbell, Dennison, and Butler (2017)
The effects of vegetation density and surface roughness on travel rate are less established than those of slope.
“The effects of vegetation density and surface roughness on travel rate are less established than those of slope, although there are off-path travel rate models that have incorporated vegetation density or landcover type to improve travel rate estimations (Tobler 1993;Alexander, Baxter, and Dakin 2005;Campbell, Dennison, and Butler 2017;Irmischer and Clarke 2018).”
From Machine learning estimation of off-trail pedestrian travel rates using LiDAR-derived slope, vegetation, and surface roughness (2026) · cites this paper as Campbell, Dennison, and Butler 2017
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- 10.1016/j.rse.2004.10.013 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2737/RMRS-GTR-213 · DOI
- 10.1093/sjaf/22.4.216 · DOI
- Beighley M., 1995, Fire Management Notes, 55, 22
- 10.2737/RMRS-RP-9 · DOI
- 10.1071/WF13021 · DOI
- 10.1071/WF9980073 · DOI
- Butler B.W., 1998, Fire Management Notes, 58, 13
- 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.05.017 · DOI · Paper page
- Dubayah R.O., 2000, Journal of Forestry, 98, 44, 10.1093/jof/98.6.44 · DOI
- 10.1071/WF11117 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1504498112 · DOI
- 10.1071/WF11097 · DOI
- Gleason P., 1991, Fire Management Notes, 52, 9
- Kraus K., 2001, International Archives of Photogrammetry Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 34, 23
- 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0019:LRSFES]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.3390/rs2030833 · DOI
- 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3390/geosciences6030035 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0168-1699(02)00121-7 · DOI
- 10.5589/m03-022 · DOI
- 10.1029/2005JG000113 · DOI
- 10.1071/WF08088 · DOI
- Snyder, G.I., 2012.The 3D elevation program: summary of program direction[online]. US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey. Available from: https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2012/3089/pdf/fs2012-3089.pdf [Accessed 14 December 2016]. · DOI · Paper page
- Steele J., 2000, 4th International wildland fire safety summit, 171
- 10.1080/01431160701469040 · DOI
- Tobler W., 1993, Three presentations on geographical analysis and modeling, Technical Report 93-1
- 10.14358/PERS.70.3.351 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.firesaf.2008.01.001 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Campbell, M. J., Dennison, P. E., & Butler, B. W. (2017) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf17031 · Cited by 42
Self-citationEscape Route Index: A Spatially-Explicit Measure of Wildland Firefighter Egress Capacity
Campbell, M. J., Page, W. G., Dennison, P. E., & Butler, B. W. (2019) · Fire · doi:10.3390/fire2030040 · Cited by 37
Self-citationSullivan, P. R., Campbell, M. J., Dennison, P. E., Brewer, S. C., & Butler, B. W. (2020) · Fire · doi:10.3390/fire3030052 · Cited by 20
Self-citationCutler, S. L., Campbell, M. J., Brewer, S. C., & Dennison, P. E. (2026) · GIScience & Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/15481603.2026.2626632
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Campbell, M. J., Dennison, P. E., & Butler, B. W.
- Affiliations
- Department of Geography, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- US Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT, USA
- Venue
- International Journal of Geographical Information Science
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-12-28
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1448-1466
- ISSN
- 1365-8816
- 1362-3087
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Funders
- USDA Forest Service (14JV11221637123, 15CR11221637105)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review