Cited by 35

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Safe separation distance score: a new metric for evaluating wildland firefighter safety zones using lidar

Campbell, Michael J., Dennison, Philip E., Butler, Bret W.·2017·International Journal of Geographical Information Science

Abstract

Safety zones are areas where firefighters can retreat to in order to avoid bodily harm when threatened by burnover or entrapment from wildland fire. At present, safety zones are primarily designated by firefighting personnel as part of daily fire management activities. Though critical to safety zone assessment, the effectiveness of this approach is inherently limited by the individual firefighter’s or crew boss’s ability to accurately and consistently interpret vegetation conditions, topography, and spatial characteristics of potential safety zones (e.g. area and geometry of a forest clearing). In order to facilitate the safety zone identification and characterization process, this study introduces a new metric for safety zone evaluation: the Safe Separation Distance Score (SSDS). The SSDS is a numerical representation of the relative suitability of a given area as a safety zone according to its size, geometry, and surrounding vegetation height. This paper describes an algorithm for calculating pixel-based and polygon-based SSDS from lidar data. SSDS is calculated for every potential safety zone within a lidar dataset covering Tahoe National Forest, California, USA. A total of 2367 potential safety zones with an SSDS ≥1 were mapped, representing areas that are suitable for fires burning in low wind and low slope conditions. The highest SSDS calculated within the study area was 9.65, a score that represents suitability in the highest wind-steepest slope conditions. Potential s…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13658816.2016.1270453

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. 10.1016/j.rse.2004.10.013 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.2737/RMRS-GTR-213 · DOI
  3. 10.1093/sjaf/22.4.216 · DOI
  4. Beighley M., 1995, Fire Management Notes, 55, 22
  5. 10.2737/RMRS-RP-9 · DOI
  6. 10.1071/WF13021 · DOI
  7. 10.1071/WF9980073 · DOI
  8. Butler B.W., 1998, Fire Management Notes, 58, 13
  9. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.05.017 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Dubayah R.O., 2000, Journal of Forestry, 98, 44, 10.1093/jof/98.6.44 · DOI
  11. 10.1071/WF11117 · DOI
  12. 10.1073/pnas.1504498112 · DOI
  13. 10.1071/WF11097 · DOI
  14. Gleason P., 1991, Fire Management Notes, 52, 9
  15. Kraus K., 2001, International Archives of Photogrammetry Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 34, 23
  16. 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0019:LRSFES]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  17. 10.3390/rs2030833 · DOI
  18. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.3390/geosciences6030035 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/S0168-1699(02)00121-7 · DOI
  22. 10.5589/m03-022 · DOI
  23. 10.1029/2005JG000113 · DOI
  24. 10.1071/WF08088 · DOI
  25. Snyder, G.I., 2012.The 3D elevation program: summary of program direction[online]. US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey. Available from: https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2012/3089/pdf/fs2012-3089.pdf [Accessed 14 December 2016]. · DOI · Paper page
  26. Steele J., 2000, 4th International wildland fire safety summit, 171
  27. 10.1080/01431160701469040 · DOI
  28. Tobler W., 1993, Three presentations on geographical analysis and modeling, Technical Report 93-1
  29. 10.14358/PERS.70.3.351 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.firesaf.2008.01.001 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Campbell, M. J., Dennison, P. E., & Butler, B. W.
Affiliations
  • Department of Geography, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
  • US Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT, USA
Venue
International Journal of Geographical Information Science
Published
2016-12-28
Volume
31
Issue
7
Pages
1448-1466
ISSN
  • 1365-8816
  • 1362-3087
Cited by
35
References
0
Language
en
Funders
USDA Forest Service (14JV11221637123, 15CR11221637105)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review