Cited by 42Human Mobility and Location-Based AnalysisData Management and AlgorithmsPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How many days are enough?: capturing routine human mobility

Open access
Stanley, Kevin, Yoo, Eun-Hye, Paul, Tuhin, Bell, Scott·2018·International Journal of Geographical Information Science

Abstract

Wedding mobile phone sensor technology and human spatial behaviour has great potential. The ubiquity of Global Positioning Systems (GPS) technology has made gathering data about human mobility simpler, more precise, and with higher fidelity, providing minute-by-minute records of the locations of cohorts from dozens of participants. While this data provides a strong basis for Geographic Information Science research, it also constitutes an invasion of the participants' privacy and can provide more information than researchers require to answer their questions. As an ethical and practical consideration, researchers should gather only as much data as they need. In this paper, we take three weeks of GPS traces from over a hundred student participants in mobile phone-based tracking studies and show that fewer than 14 days of data is necessary to establish complete activity spaces. We define 'complete' as the point at which marginal information gains become negligible according to a pairwise temporal analysis of the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence of the spatial (bivariate) histogram through time. For the fixed level of information difference, observable in the data, impacts due to individual variability, population composition, and spatial resolution are evident. However, all populations at each level of resolution examined in the paper demonstrated convergence to low divergence levels occurred within a matter of days, and to negligible information gain in less than two weeks. The methods described in the paper represent a novel metric useful to understand the interaction between measurements and information in human mobility.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13658816.2018.1434888

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Crosbie T., 2006, Journal of Research Practice, 2, 1
  2. Glasgow M., 2014, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology,26 (4), 356
  3. Hägerstrand T., 1975, Space, time and human conditions
  4. Knowles D.L., 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI),September 2014, Verona, Italy, 79
  5. Mazey M.E., 1981, The Ohio Journal of Science, 81, 212

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 42

Metadata

Authors
Stanley, K., Yoo, E.-H., Paul, T., & Bell, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Saskatchewan (CA)
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Bell, Scott
Venue
International Journal of Geographical Information Science
Published
2018-04-25
Volume
32
Issue
7
Pages
1485-1504
ISSN
  • 0269-3798 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-8816
  • 1362-3087
OpenAlex
W2799933947
Cited by
42
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2
FWCI
5.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Geographical Information Systems (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Grant Number RGPIN-2015-06318)
  • National Institutes for Health (Grant Number R01GM108731)
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (Grant Number 895-2012-1023)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Management and Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Keywords
human mobility, GPS tracks, activity space, data minimization, privacy, Kullback-Leibler divergence, spatial histograms, temporal analysis, mobile phone tracking, information gain, spatial resolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review