The DOI matches its Crossref record; 177 of the 177 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Schumpeterian entrepreneur: a review of the empirical evidence on the antecedents, behaviour and consequences of innovative entrepreneurship
Open accessAbstract
Innovative entrepreneurship is considered an important pillar for economic development and has sparked a lively discussion in academia and practice alike. Oftentimes, however, the debate is not sufficiently grounded on solid empirical evidence. The academic literature is growing but very scattered and is separated into several disciplines. We provide a summary that takes stock of the academic knowledge about innovative entrepreneurship and summarizes the evidence from 102 empirical studies published in the primary economics and management journals on the antecedents, behavior, and consequences of innovative entrepreneurship. Based on this state-of-the-art literature review, directions for future research are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Theory of Economic Development
Schumpeter, J., & Backhaus, U. (2006) · The European Heritage in Economics and the Social Sciences · doi:10.1007/0-306-48082-4_3 · Cited by 22,506
An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.
Loasby, B. J., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1983) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2232409 · Cited by 21,366
Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy
Fukuyama, F., & Schumpeter, J. A. (1997) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20048211 · Cited by 15,264
The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research
Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2000.2791611 · Cited by 11,223
An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change
Berkowitz, M. K., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1983) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/1058233 · Cited by 10,549
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00055-4 · Cited by 8,559
(2013) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.103.2.i · Cited by 8,218
Teece, D. J. (1986) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2 · Cited by 7,842
(1934) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 7,609
“A Model of Growth: Through Creative Destruction”
Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1992) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/2951599 · Cited by 7,529
Cited by
Six tips for your (systematic) literature review in business and management research
Fisch, C., & Block, J. (2018) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-018-0142-x · Cited by 516
Self-citationNonprofit capacity and social performance: Mapping the field and future directions
Nordin, N., Khatibi, A., & Azam, S. M. F. (2024) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-022-00297-2 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Block, J. H., Fisch, C. O., & van Praag, M.
- Venue
- Industry and Innovation
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-08-09
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 61-95
- ISSN
- 1366-2716 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8390
- OpenAlex
- W2511464962
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 177
- FWCI
- 42.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Schumpeterian entrepreneur: a review of the empirical evidence on the antecedents, behaviour and consequences of innovative entrepreneurship. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13662716.2016.1216397
- The paper
- Block, J. H., Fisch, C. O., & van Praag, M. (2017). The Schumpeterian entrepreneur: a review of the empirical evidence on the antecedents, behaviour and consequences of innovative entrepreneurship. Industry and Innovation. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2016.1216397
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
