Six tips for your (systematic) literature review in business and management research
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Kuckertz and Block (2021) and Fisch and Block (2018) acknowledge a lack of clear guidelines and provide the criteria for reviewing articles in management and business research.
“while Kuckertz and Block (2021) and Fisch and Block (2018) acknowledge a lack of clear guidelines and provide the criteria’s for reviewing the articles in management and business research.”
From Whither compassionate leadership? A systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as Fisch and Block 2018
The paper’s Abstract (page not given) offers six tips for literature reviews in business and management research, including advice to specify and justify article-screening and exclusion criteria. It notes that the term “systematic literature review” is not clearly defined and that understanding varies, but it does not say there is a lack of clear guidelines; it says several comprehensive guides already exist. It advises reviewers to develop criteria rather than providing a fixed set of criteria for reviewing articles. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe review mostly adopted the stages and criteria proposed by Tranfield et al. (2003), Kuckertz and Block (2021), Fisch and Block (2018) and Wolfswinkel et al. (2011).
“We mostly adopt the stages and criteria proposed by Tranfield et al. (2003), Kuckertz and Block (2021), Fisch and Block (2018) and Wolfswinkel et al. (2011).”
From Whither compassionate leadership? A systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as Fisch and Block 2018
A systematic review brings together all existing research, follows rigorous processes and methods to focus on a specific question/s, integrates and interprets the findings to increase understanding.
“A systematic review brings together all existing research, follows rigorous processes and methods to focus on a specific question/s integrates and, interprets the findings to increase understanding (Denyer and Tranfield 2009; Fisch and Block 2018; Kuckertz and Block 2021; Tranfield et al. 2003).”
From Whither compassionate leadership? A systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as Fisch and Block 2018
PRISMA offers detailed and step-by-step instructions for identifying and evaluating previous studies in relation to the current research area.
“PRISMA was used in this study because it offers detailed and step-by-step instructions for identifying and evaluating previous studies in relation to the current research area [14, 15].”
From The development of telemedicine programs in Sub-Saharan Africa: Progress and associated challenges (2022) · cites this paper as [15]
The section headed “Identify the relevant literature in a systematic way” gives advice on search strategies and screening criteria. A search of our copy for “PRISMA” and the claimed step-by-step instructions found no passage identifying PRISMA or describing what it offers, so the PRISMA-specific claim cannot be verified from this paper. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00375 · Cited by 15,386 · see citing works
Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review
Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/4132319 · Cited by 7,449 · see citing works
Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review
Booth, A., Sutton, A., Clowes, M., & James, M. M.-S. (2022) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781036232009 · Cited by 1,174 · see citing works
What You See Is What You Get? Enhancing Methodological Transparency in Management Research
Aguinis, H., Ramani, R. S., & Alabduljader, N. (2017) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2016.0011 · Cited by 477 · see citing works
Block, J., Fisch, C., & van Praag, M. (2017) · Industry and Innovation · doi:10.1080/13662716.2016.1216397 · Cited by 337 · see citing works
Self-citationSystematic approaches to a successful literature review
Pearson, F. (2014) · Educational Psychology in Practice · doi:10.1080/02667363.2014.900913 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
Doing a research literature review
Frank, H., & Hatak, I. (2014) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781782540625.00012 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
How to Get Published in the Best Entrepreneurship Journals
Fayolle, A., & Wright, M. (2014) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781782540625 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know?
Paul, J., & Rialp, A. (2020) · International Business Review · doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101717 · Cited by 2,944 · see citing works
The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research
Kraus, S., Breier, M., & Dasí-Rodríguez, S. (2020) · International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal · doi:10.1007/s11365-020-00635-4 · Cited by 1,319 · see citing works
Digital transformation: a review, synthesis and opportunities for future research
Nadkarni, S., & Prügl, R. (2020) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-020-00185-7 · Cited by 916 · see citing works
Toward an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Research Program
Wurth, B., Stam, E., & Spigel, B. (2022) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/1042258721998948 · Cited by 789 · see citing works
“Building on the insights from these reviews, we take a concept-centered approach to our review ( Fisch & Block, 2018) and focus on two issues.”
How to design bibliometric research: an overview and a framework proposal
Öztürk, O., Kocaman, R., & Kanbach, D. K. (2024) · Review of Managerial Science · doi:10.1007/s11846-024-00738-0 · Cited by 737 · see citing works
Sauer, P. C., & Seuring, S. A. (2023) · Review of Managerial Science · doi:10.1007/s11846-023-00668-3 · Cited by 434 · see citing works
Walter, A. (2020) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-020-00186-6 · Cited by 382 · see citing works
Williams, R. I., Clark, L. A., Clark, R., & Raffo, D. M. (2020) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2020.09.007 · Cited by 304 · see citing works
Eight tips and questions for your bibliographic study in business and management research
Block, J., & Fisch, C. O. (2020) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-020-00188-4 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Self-citationMariani, M. M., Machado, I., & Nambisan, S. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113364 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Review Research as Scientific Inquiry
Kunisch, S., Denyer, D., Bartunek, J. M., Menz, M., & Cardinal, L. B. (2022) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/10944281221127292 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
Keding, C. (2021) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-020-00181-x · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Neumann, T. (2020) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-020-00193-7 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
How to conduct a meta-analysis in eight steps: A practical guide
Hansen, C., Steinmetz, H., & Block, J. (2022) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-021-00247-4 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Self-citationThe impact of role models on entrepreneurial intentions and behavior: a review of the literature
Abbasianchavari, A., & Moritz, A. (2020) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-019-00179-0 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Buzzao, G., & Rizzi, F. (2020) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2614 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Kaushal, N., Kaurav, R. P. S., Sivathanu, B., & Kaushık, N. (2021) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-021-00249-2 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Aquilani, B., Piccarozzi, M., Abbate, T., & Codini, A. P. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12218943 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
A review of the trend of microlearning
Leong, K., Sung, A., Au, D., & Blanchard, C. (2020) · Journal of Work-Applied Management · doi:10.1108/jwam-10-2020-0044 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Wimbardana, R., & Djalante, R. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120307 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Innovation research in tourism: Research streams and actions for the future
Pikkemaat, B., Peters, M., & Bichler, B. F. (2019) · Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.jhtm.2019.10.007 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Religion and entrepreneurship: a map of the field and a bibliometric analysis
Block, J., Fisch, C. O., & Rehan, M. (2019) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-019-00177-2 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Self-citationThe effects of visualization on judgment and decision-making: a systematic literature review
Eberhard, K. (2021) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-021-00235-8 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Tanova, C., & Bayighomog, S. W. (2022) · Service Industries Journal · doi:10.1080/02642069.2022.2045279 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
A systematic literature review of crowdfunding and sustainability: highlighting what really matters
Böckel, A., Hörisch, J., & Tenner, I. (2020) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-020-00189-3 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Designing tourism governance: The role of local residents
Bichler, B. F. (2019) · Journal of Destination Marketing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.jdmm.2019.100389 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Digital entrepreneurial ecosystems: A systematic literature review
Bejjani, M., Göcke, L., & Menter, M. (2023) · Technological forecasting & social change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122372 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Sarja, M., Onkila, T., & Mäkelä, M. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125492 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Kraus, S., Bouncken, R. B., & Aránega, A. Y. (2024) · Review of Managerial Science · doi:10.1007/s11846-024-00729-1 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Pietronudo, M. C., Croidieu, G. P. A., & Schiavone, F. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121828 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Onkila, T., & Sarna, B. (2021) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.2210 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Soft skills, do we know what we are talking about?
Zapata, S. I. M., Román-Calderón, J. P., Robledo‐Ardila, C., & Jaramillo-Serna, M. A. (2021) · Review of Managerial Science · doi:10.1007/s11846-021-00474-9 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Critical review of nano and micro-level building circularity indicators and frameworks
Khadim, N., Agliata, R., Marino, A., Thaheem, M. J., & Mollo, L. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131859 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
A systematic literature review of exploratory factor analyses in management
Howard, M. C. (2023) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113969 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Martins, A., Branco, M. C., Melo, P. N., & Machado, C. F. D. S. C. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14116493 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Richlan, F., Weiß, M., Kastner, P., & Braid, J. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1240790 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Mhlanga, D. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14137804 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
The potentials of augmented reality in supply chain management: a state-of-the-art review
Rejeb, A., Keogh, J. G., Wamba, S. F., & Treiblmaier, H. (2020) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-020-00201-w · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Kuckertz, A., & Brändle, L. (2021) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-021-00221-0 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
A systematic review of the implementation of industry 4.0 from the organisational perspective
Nayernia, H., Bahemia, H., & Papagiannidis, S. (2021) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2021.2002964 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Archi, Y. E., Benbba, B., Nizamatdinova, Z., Issakov, Y., Vargáné, G. I., & Dávid, L. D. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15065086 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Munodawafa, R. T., & Johl, S. K. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11216067 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Taylorism on steroids or enabling autonomy? A systematic review of algorithmic management
Noponen, N., Feshchenko, P., Auvinen, T., Luoma‐aho, V., & Abrahamsson, P. (2023) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-023-00345-5 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Reviewing systematic literature reviews: ten key questions and criteria for reviewers
Kuckertz, A., & Block, J. (2021) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-021-00228-7 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Self-citationWaqas, M., Hamzah, Z. L., & Salleh, N. A. M. (2020) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-020-00182-w · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Smyth, C., Dennehy, D., Wamba, S. F., Scott, M., & Harfouche, A. (2024) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2024.2341415 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Xia, N., Xie, Q., Griffin, M. A., Ye, G., & Yuan, J. (2020) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2020.105834 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Mechanisms
Wurth, B., Stam, E., & Spigel, B. (2023) · Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship · doi:10.1561/0300000089 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Machine Learning Methods in Smart Lighting Toward Achieving User Comfort: A Survey
Putrada, A. G., Abdurohman, M., Perdana, D., & Nuha, H. H. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3169765 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
“RQ is the essential part of the introduction and motivates in doing SLR [13].”
BackgroundEntrepreneurship and the sustainable bioeconomy transformation
Kuckertz, A., Berger, E. S. C., & Brändle, L. (2020) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2020.10.003 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Entrepreneurial Leadership and Sustainable Development—A Systematic Literature Review
Păuceanu, A. M., Rabie, N., Moustafa, A., & Jiroveanu, D. C. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su132111695 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Schäfer, N. (2022) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-021-00252-7 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Weiß, L., & Kanbach, D. K. (2021) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-021-00223-y · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Pooja, K., & Upadhyaya, P. (2022) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-022-00312-6 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Review of enablers and barriers of sustainable business practices in SMEs
Basit, S. A., Gharleghi, B., Batool, K., Hassan, S. S., Jahanshahi, A. A., & Kliem, M. E. (2024) · Journal of Economy and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.ject.2024.03.005 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Block, J., & Kuckertz, A. (2018) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-018-0149-3 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Self-citationAtif, S., Ahmed, S., Wasim, M., Zeb, B., Pervez, Z., & Quinn, L. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13116501 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Defining digital fashion: Reshaping the field via a systematic review
Baek, E., Haines, S. J., Fares, O. H., Huang, Z., Hong, Y., & Lee, S. H. M. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107407 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Corporate social responsibility and Islamic banks: a systematic literature review
Zafar, M. B., & Sulaiman, A. A. (2018) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-018-0150-x · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Eras of Digital Entrepreneurship
Kollmann, T., Kleine-Stegemann, L., de Cruppe, K., & Then-Bergh, C. (2021) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-021-00728-6 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Widmann, M., Follert, F., & Wolz, M. (2020) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-020-00190-w · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Anthropomorphism and consumer behaviour: A SPAR‐4‐SLR protocol compliant hybrid review
Khan, F. M., Anas, M., & Uddin, S. M. F. (2023) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.12985 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Factors leading to unsafe behavior in the twenty first century workplace: a review
Dodoo, J. E., & Al-Samarraie, H. (2019) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-019-00157-6 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Whither compassionate leadership? A systematic review
Ramachandran, S., Balasubramanian, S., James, W. F., & Al Masaeid, T. (2024) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-023-00340-w · Cited by 76 · see citing works
“A systematic review brings together all existing research, follows rigorous processes and methods to focus on a specific question/s integrates and, interprets the findings to increase understanding (Denyer and Tranfield 2009; Fisch and Block 2018; Kuckertz and Block 2021; Tranfield et al.”
BackgroundHerrmann, H., & Masawi, B. (2022) · Strategic Change · doi:10.1002/jsc.2525 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Clark, R., Clark, L. A., Raffo, D. M., & Williams, R. I. (2020) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-020-00184-8 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
How can rural businesses thrive in the digital economy? A UK perspective
Tiwasing, P., Clark, B., & Gkartzios, M. (2022) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10745 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Abbas, K. (2025) · The British Accounting Review · doi:10.1016/j.bar.2025.101551 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
The effect of religiosity on life satisfaction: A meta-analysis
Sholihin, M. R., Hardivizon, H., Wanto, D., & Saputra, H. (2022) · HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies · doi:10.4102/hts.v78i4.7172 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Schweikl, S., & Obermaier, R. (2019) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-019-00173-6 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
The development of telemedicine programs in Sub-Saharan Africa: Progress and associated challenges
Dodoo, J. E., Al-Samarraie, H., & Alsswey, A. (2022) · Health and Technology · doi:10.1007/s12553-021-00626-7 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
“PRISMA was used in this study because it offers detailed and step-by-step instructions for identifying and evaluating previous studies in relation to the current research area [14, 15].”
MethodEntrepreneurial Fraud: A Multidisciplinary Review and Synthesized Framework
Scheaf, D. J., & Wood, M. S. (2021) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/10422587211001818 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Mostepaniuk, A., Nasr, E., Awwad, R. I., Hamdan, S., & Aljuhmani, H. Y. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su141811203 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Brand activism as a marketing strategy: an integrative framework and research agenda
Pimentel, P. C., Suter, M. B., & Didonet, S. R. (2023) · Journal of Brand Management · doi:10.1057/s41262-023-00335-8 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Overconfidence and narcissism among the upper echelons: a systematic literature review
Brunzel, J. (2020) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-020-00194-6 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Fanelli, S., Pratici, L., Salvatore, F. P., Donelli, C. C., & Zangrandi, A. (2022) · Management Research Review · doi:10.1108/mrr-09-2021-0648 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
WHY DO RETAIL CUSTOMERS HESITATE FOR SHOPPING GROCERY ONLINE?
Klepek, M., & Bauerová, R. (2020) · Technological and Economic Development of Economy · doi:10.3846/tede.2020.13970 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Innovation types in public sector organizations: a systematic review of the literature
Buchheim, L., Krieger, A., & Arndt, S. (2019) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-019-00174-5 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Determinants of football players’ valuation: A systematic review
Franceschi, M., Brocard, J., Follert, F., & Gouguet, J. (2023) · Journal of Economic Surveys · doi:10.1111/joes.12552 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Herding behaviour in the capital market: What do we know and what is next?
Komalasari, P. T., Asri, M., Purwanto, B. M., & Setiyono, B. (2021) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-021-00212-1 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Knowledge and innovation in start-up ventures: A systematic literature review and research agenda
Guckenbiehl, P., de Zubielqui, G. C., & Lindsay, N. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121026 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
How to maintain sustainable consumer behaviours: A systematic review and future research agenda
Elhoushy, S., & Jang, S. S. (2023) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.12905 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Practices Pursuing the Sustainability of A Healthcare Organization: A Systematic Review
Mostepaniuk, A., Akalın, T., & Реза, П. М. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15032353 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Contribuições e Limitações de Revisões Narrativas e Revisões Sistemáticas na Área de Negócios
Mendes‐Da‐Silva, W. (2019) · Revista de Administração Contemporânea · doi:10.1590/1982-7849rac2019190094 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Smart city technologies from the perspective of technology acceptance
Dirsehan, T., & van Zoonen, L. (2022) · IET Smart Cities · doi:10.1049/smc2.12040 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Aliyev, F., Ürkmez, T., & Wagner, R. (2018) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-018-00152-3 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Nguyen, C. N., Hoang, G. T., & Tuấn, L. T. (2023) · Tourism Management Perspectives · doi:10.1016/j.tmp.2023.101197 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Bir Araştırma Metodolojisi Olarak Sistematik Literatür Taramasına Genel Bakış
YILDIZ, A. (2022) · Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi · doi:10.18037/ausbd.1227366 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Management of hydrogen mobility challenges: A systematic literature review
Calandra, D., Wang, T., Cane, M., & Alfiero, S. (2023) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137305 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
New work: New motivation? A comprehensive literature review on the impact of workplace technologies
Schmid, Y., & Dowling, M. J. (2020) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-020-00204-7 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
A literature survey of corporate failure prediction models
Jones, S. (2023) · Journal of Accounting Literature · doi:10.1108/jal-08-2022-0086 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Leitner, M. C., Daumann, F., Follert, F., & Richlan, F. (2022) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-021-00254-5 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Presenting the POWER Framework of Conducting Literature Review
Rana, S., Sakshi, & Singh, J. (2022) · Review of management literature · doi:10.1108/s2754-586520220000001001 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
The green manufacturing framework—A systematic literature review
Bendig, D., Kleine-Stegemann, L., & Gisa, K. (2023) · Cleaner Engineering and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.clet.2023.100613 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
A systematic review of factors leading to occupational injuries and fatalities
Dodoo, J. E., & Al‐Samarraie, H. (2021) · Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1007/s10389-020-01427-4 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Negt, P., & Haunschild, A. (2024) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-023-00397-7 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Pandey, A., Maheshwari, M., & Malik, N. (2025) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105080 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Khan, F. M., Uddin, S. M. F., Anas, M., Kautish, P., & Thaichon, P. (2024) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.2436 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
How to manage open innovation projects? An integrative framework
Lappalainen, L., Aleem, M., & Sandberg, B. (2023) · Project Leadership and Society · doi:10.1016/j.plas.2023.100095 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Tingelhoff, F., Brugger, M., & Leimeister, J. M. (2024) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1177/02683962241304105 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
- Authors
- Fisch, C., & Block, J.
- Affiliations
- Universität Trier (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Fisch, Christian
- Venue
- Management Review Quarterly
- Published
- 2018-04
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 103-106
- ISSN
- 2198-1620 (ISSN-L)
- 2198-1639
- OpenAlex
- W2802739669
- Cited by
- 516
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 66 · 2025: 81 · 2024: 82 · 2023: 88 · 2022: 81 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 6
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- link.springer.com
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Management Review Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Funders
- Universität Hohenheim
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Business Strategies and Management Research
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Business and Management Studies
- Keywords
- systematic reviews, literature review methodology, transparency, reproducibility, research questions, business and management research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
