The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Wildlife tourism: the intangible, psychological benefits of human–wildlife encounters
Abstract
This article presents the results of an ethnographic study of wildlife tourists. The findings reveal the commonalities and complexities of the wildlife experience during wildlife encounters at home and while on holiday. Nature's design, performance and immense biodiversity initiate an emotional response of awe, wonder and privilege that unlocks ecocentric and anthropomorphic connections to wild animals and a feeling that is ‘beyond words’. There is time to stand and stare, and contemplate. Nature and wildlife are not only spatial events but also temporal ones. In this liminal, embodied space of a wildlife encounter, socially constructed modern fast time dissipates and is replaced by stillness and nature's time whereby participants are totally absorbed in the spectacle. All thought and action is concentrated on the moment. This provokes a deep sense of well-being that transcends the initial encounter leading to spiritual fulfilment and psychological health benefits. The implications of this research has relevance to environmental conservation particularly the recognition that conserving habitats and wildlife has an intrinsic connection to the future well-being of the human population who are part of the ecosystem and not separate from it.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Phenomenological research methods
Moustakas, C. (1994) · doi:10.4135/9781412995658 · Cited by 13,919
Assessing Subjective Well-Being: Progress and Opportunities
Diener, E. (1994) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/bf01207052 · Cited by 2,317
Cited by
What are the benefits of interacting with nature?
Keniger, L., Gaston, K., Irvine, K., & Fuller, R. (2013) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph10030913 · Cited by 1,204
Sandifer, P. A., Sutton-Grier, A. E., & Ward, B. P. (2015) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.12.007 · Cited by 1,014
Doses of Neighborhood Nature: The Benefits for Mental Health of Living with Nature
Cox, D. T. C., Shanahan, D. F., Hudson, H. L., Plummer, K. E., Siriwardena, G. M., Fuller, R. A., Anderson, K., Hancock, S., & Gaston, K. J. (2017) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biw173 · Cited by 401
Beaver: Nature's ecosystem engineers
Brazier, R. E., Puttock, A., Graham, H. A., Auster, R. E., Davies, K. H., & Brown, C. M. L. (2021) · WIREs Water · doi:10.1002/wat2.1494 · Cited by 268
A systematic review of the health and well-being benefits of biodiverse environments.
Lovell, R., Wheeler, B. W., Higgins, S. L., Irvine, K. N., & Depledge, M. H. (2014) · Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B · doi:10.1080/10937404.2013.856361 · Cited by 221
Metadata
- Authors
- Curtin, S.
- Venue
- Current Issues in Tourism
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-11
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 5-6
- Pages
- 451-474
- ISSN
- 1368-3500 (ISSN-L)
- 1747-7603
- OpenAlex
- W2054380899
- Cited by
- 315
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Wildlife tourism: the intangible, psychological benefits of human–wildlife encounters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13683500903042857
- The paper
- Curtin, S. (2009). Wildlife tourism: the intangible, psychological benefits of human–wildlife encounters. Current Issues in Tourism. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500903042857
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.