The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CORE NETWORKS, SOCIAL ISOLATION, AND NEW MEDIA: How Internet and mobile phone use is related to network size and diversity
Abstract
Evidence from the US General Social Surveys (GSS) suggests that during the past 20 years, people have become increasingly socially isolated and their core discussion networks have become smaller and less diverse. One explanation offered for this trend is the use of mobile phones and the Internet. This study reports on the findings of a 2008 survey that replicates and expands on the GSS network methodology to explore the relationship between the use of new technologies and the size and diversity of core networks. The findings conflict with the results of the 2004 GSS, i.e. we find that social isolation has not increased since 1985. However, the current study supports the conclusions that the size of core networks has declined and the number of nonkin in core networks has diminished. Mobile phone and Internet use, especially specific uses of social media, were found to have a positive relationship to network size and diversity. In discussing these trends, we speculate that specific social media provide for a ‘pervasive awareness’ within personal networks that has increased the specialization of close ties. We argue that this same pervasive awareness provides for heightened surveillance of network members, the result of which is a higher level of perceived diversity within networks based on metrics that include political affiliation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415 · Cited by 18,567
Putnam, R. (2000) · doi:10.1145/358916.361990 · Cited by 17,114
Statistical Abstract of the United States
(2005) · Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences · doi:10.1002/0471667196.ess2527 · Cited by 8,785
The theory of communicative action
(2014) · The Philosophy of Habermas · doi:10.4324/9781315710495-5 · Cited by 8,634
The division of labor in society
Durkheim, É. (1935) · Columbia Law Review · doi:10.4324/9780429499838-5 · Cited by 5,156
Social Relationships and Health.
Cohen, S. (2004) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.59.8.676 · Cited by 4,852
Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being?
Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.53.9.1017 · Cited by 4,793
The Rise of the Network Society
Castells, M. (2009) · doi:10.1002/9781444319514 · Cited by 4,664
Dewey, J. (1927) · University of Michigan Library Repository · Cited by 4,147
Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/1540-4560.00248 · Cited by 2,202
Cited by
Phua, J., Jin, S. V., & Kim, J. (. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.041 · Cited by 625
Twenge, J. M., Spitzberg, B. H., & Campbell, W. K. (2019) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407519836170 · Cited by 520
Lu, W., & Hampton, K. N. (2017) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444815621514 · Cited by 204
Self-citationDoes online technology make us more or less sociable? A preliminary review and call for research
Waytz, A., & Gray, K. (2018) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691617746509 · Cited by 157
Psychological Correlates of Ghosting and Breadcrumbing Experiences: A Preliminary Study among Adults
Navarro, R., Larrañaga, E., Yubero, S., & Víllora, B. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17031116 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Hampton, K. N., Sessions, L. F., & Her, E. J.
- Venue
- Information, Communication & Society
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-02
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 130-155
- ISSN
- 1369-118X (ISSN-L)
- 1468-4462
- OpenAlex
- W1944014432
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 34.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CORE NETWORKS, SOCIAL ISOLATION, AND NEW MEDIA: How Internet and mobile phone use is related to network size and diversity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/1369118x.2010.513417
- The paper
- Hampton, K. N., Sessions, L. F., & Her, E. J. (2011). CORE NETWORKS, SOCIAL ISOLATION, AND NEW MEDIA: How Internet and mobile phone use is related to network size and diversity. Information, Communication & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2010.513417
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.