The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
#Funeral and Instagram: death, social media, and platform vernacular
Abstract
This paper presents findings from a study of Instagram use and funerary practices that analysed photographs shared on public profiles tagged with ‘#funeral’. We found that the majority of images uploaded with the hashtag #funeral often communicated a person's emotional circumstances and affective context, and allowed them to reposition their funeral experience amongst wider networks of acquaintances, friends, and family. We argue that photo-sharing through Instagram echoes broader shifts in commemorative and memorialization practices, moving away from formal and institutionalized rituals to informal and personalized, vernacular practices. Finally, we consider how Instagram's ‘platform vernacular’ unfolds in relation to traditions and contexts of death, mourning, and memorialization. This research contributes to a broader understanding of how platform vernaculars are shaped through the logics of architecture and use. This research also directly contributes to the understanding of death and digital media by examining how social media is being mobilized in relation to death, the differences that different media platforms make, and the ways social media are increasingly entwined with the places, events, and rituals of mourning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Handbook of Qualitative Research
Crozier, G., Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121684 · Cited by 26,666
Gillespie, T. (2010) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444809342738 · Cited by 2,522 · cited 1×
“The affordances that are built into the hardware and software of social media platforms delimit particular modes of expression or action (Gillespie, 2010; Montfort & Bogost, 2009), and as a result prioritize particular forms of social participation.”
BackgroundDigital photography: communication, identity, memory
van Dijck, J. (2008) · Visual Communication · doi:10.1177/1470357207084865 · Cited by 508
Cited by
Highfield, T., & Leaver, T. (2016) · Communication Research and Practice · doi:10.1080/22041451.2016.1155332 · Cited by 542
Matamoros-Fernández, A. (2017) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2017.1293130 · Cited by 447
#familygoals: Family Influencers, Calibrated Amateurism, and Justifying Young Digital Labor
Abidin, C. (2017) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305117707191 · Cited by 396
The social media life of climate change: Platforms, publics, and future imaginaries
Pearce, W., Niederer, S., Özkula, S. M., & Sánchez Querubín, N. (2019) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.569 · Cited by 334
Rieder, B., Matamoros-Fernández, A., & Coromina, Ò. (2018) · Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies · doi:10.1177/1354856517736982 · Cited by 285
Metadata
- Authors
- Gibbs, M., Meese, J., Arnold, M., Nansen, B., & Carter, M.
- Venue
- Information, Communication & Society
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-12
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 255-268
- ISSN
- 1369-118X (ISSN-L)
- 1468-4462
- OpenAlex
- W2086425961
- Cited by
- 581
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 76.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: #Funeral and Instagram: death, social media, and platform vernacular. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/1369118x.2014.987152
- The paper
- Gibbs, M., Meese, J., Arnold, M., Nansen, B., & Carter, M. (2015). #Funeral and Instagram: death, social media, and platform vernacular. Information, Communication & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2014.987152
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.