The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
#familygoals: Family Influencers, Calibrated Amateurism, and Justifying Young Digital Labor
Open accessAbstract
Following in the celebrity trajectory of mommy bloggers, global micro-microcelebrities, and reality TV families, family Influencers on social media are one genre of microcelebrity for whom the “anchor” content in which they demonstrate their creative talents, such as producing musical covers or comedy sketches, is a highly profitable endeavor. Yet, this commerce is sustained by an undercurrent of “filler” content wherein everyday routines of domestic life are shared with followers as a form of “calibrated amateurism.” Calibrated amateurism is a practice and aesthetic in which actors in an attention economy labor specifically over crafting contrived authenticity that portrays the raw aesthetic of an amateur, whether or not they really are amateurs by status or practice, by relying on the performance ecology of appropriate platforms, affordances, tools, cultural vernacular, and social capital. In this article, I consider the anatomy of calibrated amateurism, and how this practice relates to follower engagement and responses. While some follower responses have highlighted concerns over the children’s well-being, a vast majority overtly signal their love, support, and even envy toward such parenting. I draw on ethnographically informed content analysis of two group of family Influencers on social media to illustrate the enactment and value of calibrated amateurism in an increasingly saturated ecology and, investigate how such parents justify the digital labor in which their children partake to produce viable narratives of domestic life.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life.
Naegele, K. D., & Goffman, E. (1956) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2089106 · Cited by 25,991
The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life
Goffman, E. (2023) · Social Theory Re-Wired · doi:10.4324/9781003320609-59 · Cited by 17,562
Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy
Reid, L. A., & Polanyi, M. (1959) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3119338 · Cited by 7,538
Staged Authenticity: Arrangements of Social Space in Tourist Settings
MacCannell, D. (1973) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/225585 · Cited by 3,344
Abidin, C. (2016) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305116641342 · Cited by 677
Self-citationSocial Media Ethnography: The Digital Researcher in a Messy Web
Postill, J., & Pink, S. (2012) · Media International Australia · doi:10.1177/1329878x1214500114 · Cited by 644
#Funeral and Instagram: death, social media, and platform vernacular
Gibbs, M., Meese, J., Arnold, M., Nansen, B., & Carter, M. (2015) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2014.987152 · Cited by 581
Ordinary People and the Media: The Demotic Turn
Turner, G. (2010) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446269565 · Cited by 559
Communicative ❤ intimacies: Influencers and Perceived Interconnectedness
Abidin, C. (2015) · UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) · doi:10.7264/n3mw2ffg · Cited by 477
Self-citationThe Money Shot: Trash, Class, and the Making of TV Talk Shows
Grindstaff, L. (2002) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226309088.001.0001 · Cited by 323
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- 10.1057/9781137469816.0018 · doi:10.1057/9781137469816.0018
- Bennett J., 2011, Television personalities: Stardom and the small screen
- 10.3138/9781442665231 · doi:10.3138/9781442665231
- 10.5130/csr.v19i1.3223 · doi:10.5130/csr.v19i1.3223
- 10.1504/IJWBC.2016.10001832 · doi:10.1504/ijwbc.2016.10001832
- 10.5130/csr.v19i1.2679 · doi:10.5130/csr.v19i1.2679
- 10.5130/csr.v19i1.2480 · doi:10.5130/csr.v19i1.2480
- Leaver T., 2015, Re-orientation: Translingual transcultural transmedia. Studies in narrative, language, identity, and knowledge, 149
- Marwick A. E., 2013, Status update: Celebrity, publicity, & branding in the social media age
- 10.5130/csr.v19i1.2534 · doi:10.5130/csr.v19i1.2534
- Rein I., 1997, High visibility: The making and marketing of professionals into celebrities
- Senft T. M., 2008, Camgirls: Celebrity & community in the age of social networks
- Stevenson S., 2012, Wired, 20, 120
- 10.5130/csr.v19i1.3170 · doi:10.5130/csr.v19i1.3170
Cited by
Mapping Internet Celebrity on TikTok: Exploring Attention Economies and Visibility Labours
Abidin, C. (2020) · Cultural Science Journal · doi:10.5334/csci.140 · Cited by 564
Self-citationSelling brands while staying “Authentic”: The professionalization of Instagram influencers
van Driel, L., & Dumitrica, D. (2021) · Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies · doi:10.1177/1354856520902136 · Cited by 268
All hype or the real deal? Investigating user engagement with virtual influencers in tourism
Xie-Carson, L., Magor, T., Benckendorff, P., & Hughes, K. (2023) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2023.104779 · Cited by 195
Participatory branding on social media: The affordances of live streaming for creative labor
Meisner, C., & Ledbetter, A. M. (2022) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444820972392 · Cited by 85
Sharenting: A systematic review of the empirical literature
Tosuntaş, Ş. B., & Griffiths, M. D. (2024) · Journal of Family Theory & Review · doi:10.1111/jftr.12566 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Abidin, C.
- Venue
- Social Media + Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-04
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 2056-3051 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2623524052
- Cited by
- 396
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 30.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: #familygoals: Family Influencers, Calibrated Amateurism, and Justifying Young Digital Labor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/2056305117707191
- The paper
- Abidin, C. (2017). #familygoals: Family Influencers, Calibrated Amateurism, and Justifying Young Digital Labor. Social Media + Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117707191
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.