Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,289

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social media use and participation: a meta-analysis of current research

Boulianne, Shelley·2015·Information, Communication & Society

Abstract

Social media has skyrocketed to popularity in the past few years. The Arab Spring in 2011 as well as the 2008 and 2012 Obama campaigns have fueled interest in how social media might affect citizens’ participation in civic and political life. In response, researchers have produced 36 studies assessing the relationship between social media use and participation in civic and political life. This manuscript presents the results of a meta-analysis of research on social media use and participation. Overall, the metadata demonstrate a positive relationship between social media use and participation. More than 80% of coefficients are positive. However, questions remain about whether the relationship is causal and transformative. Only half of the coefficients were statistically significant. Studies using panel data are less likely to report positive and statistically significant coefficients between social media use and participation, compared to cross-sectional surveys. The metadata also suggest that social media use has minimal impact on participation in election campaigns.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1369118x.2015.1008542

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. 10.1177/0894439309334325 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1080/19331681.2012.709045 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1111/jcc4.12048 · DOI
  4. 10.1080/10584600902854363 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1080/10584609.2010.540305 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Brenner J., 2013, 72% of online adults are social networking site users
  7. 10.1080/19331681.2013.850464 · DOI
  8. 10.1089/cyber.2012.0468 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.012 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1177/0002764213489011 · DOI
  11. 10.1177/0093650211426004 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1080/1369118X.2013.862288 · DOI
  13. 10.1177/1461444812462844 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1080/15377857.2011.540209 · doi:10.1080/15377857.2011.540209
  15. 10.1177/1461444813487960 · DOI
  16. 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01574.x · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1111/jcom.12103 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1080/08838151.2013.787079 · DOI
  19. 10.1177/0267323112465369 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1177/1081180X03008003002 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.044 · DOI
  22. 10.1111/jcom.12034 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Klofstad C., 2011, Civic talk: Peers, politics, and the future of democracy
  24. Lipsey M. W., 2001, Practical meta-analysis
  25. 10.1089/cyber.2012.0153 · DOI
  26. 10.1080/15205436.2012.713149 · DOI
  27. 10.1177/009365096023002002 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1080/105846099198659 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1177/000312240607100301 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Musick M., 2008, Volunteers: A social profile
  31. Office for National Statistics., 2013, Social networking: The UK as a leader in Europe
  32. 10.1002/jcop.20176 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1080/19331680902996403 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1177/0894439312455474 · doi:10.1177/0894439312455474
  35. 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01475.x · DOI · Paper page
  36. deSilver D., 2014, Facebook is a news source for many, but only incidentally
  37. Skoric M. M., 2011, eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 3, 70, 10.29379/jedem.v3i1.49 · DOI
  38. 10.1080/08838151.2013.787076 · DOI
  39. 10.1177/0894439313490625 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1177/0894439313489656 · DOI
  41. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01629.x · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1177/0002764213479375 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01635.x · DOI · Paper page
  44. Verba S., 1995, Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics, 10.2307/j.ctv1pnc1k7 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1089/cyber.2009.0226 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1177/0002764213515226 · DOI
  47. 10.1080/1369118X.2013.871318 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.15581/003.27.4.33-48 · DOI
  49. 10.1177/0894439309335162 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1177/0894439313489962 · DOI
  51. Zhang X., 2014, International Journal of Communication, 8, 21
  52. Zickuhr K., 2010, Generations 2010

Cited by

See all 1,289

Metadata

Authors
Boulianne, S.
Venue
Information, Communication & Society
Published
2015-03-09
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
524-538
ISSN
  • 1369-118X (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-4462
OpenAlex
W2016614869
Cited by
1,289
References
5
FWCI
37.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social media use and participation: a meta-analysis of current research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/1369118x.2015.1008542
The paper
Boulianne, S. (2015). Social media use and participation: a meta-analysis of current research. Information, Communication & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2015.1008542

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.