Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 429

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 88 of the 88 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Populist online communication: introduction to the special issue

Open access
Engesser, Sven, Fawzi, Nayla, Larsson, Anders Olof·2017·Information, Communication & Society

Abstract

Populism continues to gain traction in politics but there has been relatively little research on how it plays out on the Internet. The special issue at hand aims at narrowing this gap of research by focusing on the close relation between populism and online communication. This introduction presents an integrative definition of populism, as well as a theoretical analysis of the interplay between populist communication logic and online opportunity structures. The individual contributions discuss how populist actors may benefit from the Internet. They analyze how political leaders and extreme parties use populist online communication. The authors also shed light on how populist movements may relate to various political parties. They finally demonstrate which groups of social media users are more susceptible to populism than others and what effects populist online communication may have on citizens. We hope that this special issue will contribute to the discussion on what is arguably one of the largest political challenges currently faced by a series of nations around the globe.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1369118x.2017.1328525

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 88 references

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. 10.1057/978-1-137-53825-3_46 · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-53825-3_46
  2. Altheide D. L., 2014, Media edge: Media logic and social reality, 10.3726/978-1-4539-1401-4 · doi:10.3726/978-1-4539-1401-4
  3. Altheide D. L., 1979, Media logic
  4. 10.3366/edinburgh/9780748617692.001.0001 · doi:10.3366/edinburgh/9780748617692.001.0001
  5. Caiani M., 2016, Italian Political Science Review, 46, 243
  6. 10.1111/j.1662-6370.2011.02019.x · doi:10.1111/j.1662-6370.2011.02019.x
  7. Esser F., 2017, Populist political communication in Europe, 365
  8. 10.1080/10584600490481334 · doi:10.1080/10584600490481334
  9. Gerbaudo P., 2014, Social media, politics and the state: Protests, revolutions, riots, crime and policing in the age of Facebook, Twitter and YouTube, 16
  10. 10.1177/1461444812450685 · doi:10.1177/1461444812450685
  11. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1080/13183222.2013.11009118 · doi:10.1080/13183222.2013.11009118
  13. Reinemann C., 2017, Populist political communication in Europe, 12
  14. Sunstein C. R., 2001, Republic.com
  15. Taggart P., 2000, Populism
  16. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 429

Metadata

Authors
Engesser, S., Fawzi, N., & Larsson, A. O.
Venue
Information, Communication & Society
Published
2017-05-24
Volume
20
Issue
9
Pages
1279-1292
ISSN
  • 1369-118X (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-4462
OpenAlex
W2617346885
Cited by
429
References
88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Funders
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (C15.0051)
  • European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST Action IS1308)
  • National Science Foundation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Populist online communication: introduction to the special issue. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/1369118x.2017.1328525
The paper
Engesser, S., Fawzi, N., & Larsson, A. O. (2017). Populist online communication: introduction to the special issue. Information, Communication & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2017.1328525

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.