The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Populists Prefer Social Media Over Talk Shows: An Analysis of Populist Messages and Stylistic Elements Across Six Countries
Open accessAbstract
For studying populism in a hybrid and high-choice media environment, the comparison of various media channels is especially instructive. We argue that populism-related communication is a combination of key messages (content) and certain stylistic devices (form), and we compare their utilization by a broad range of political actors on Facebook, Twitter, and televised talk shows across six countries (CH, DE, FR, IT, UK, and US). We conducted a content analysis of social media and talk show statements ( N = 2067) from 31 parties during a nonelection period of 3 months in 2015. We place special emphasis on stylistic devices and find that they can be grouped into three dimensions—equivalent to three dimensions used for populist key messages. We further find that political parties are generally more inclined to use populism-related communication on Facebook and Twitter than in political talk shows and that both new challenger parties and extreme parties use higher amounts of populist key messages and style elements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mudde, C. (2004) · Government and Opposition · doi:10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x · Cited by 5,286
Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy
Canovan, M. (1999) · Political Studies · doi:10.1111/1467-9248.00184 · Cited by 2,451
The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean
Wodak, R. (2015) · doi:10.4135/9781446270073 · Cited by 1,925
Jagers, J., & Walgrave, S. (2007) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00690.x · Cited by 1,487
Competition Between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party Success
MEGUID, B. M. (2005) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055405051701 · Cited by 1,401
The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation
Moffitt, B. (2016) · Stanford University Press eBooks · doi:10.11126/stanford/9780804796132.001.0001 · Cited by 1,333
The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power
Chadwick, A. (2017) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190696726.001.0001 · Cited by 1,174
Stanley, B. (2008) · Journal of Political Ideologies · doi:10.1080/13569310701822289 · Cited by 1,159
Political communication in a high-choice media environment: a challenge for democracy?
Van Aelst, P., Strömbäck, J., Aalberg, T., Esser, F., de Vreese, C., Matthes, J., Hopmann, D., Salgado, S., Hubé, N., Stępińska, A., et al. (2017) · Annals of the International Communication Association · doi:10.1080/23808985.2017.1288551 · Cited by 974
Self-citationPopulism and social media: how politicians spread a fragmented ideology
Engesser, S., Ernst, N., Esser, F., & Büchel, F. (2017) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2016.1207697 · Cited by 918
Self-citation
Cited by
Populism as “Truth”: How Mediated Authenticity Strengthens the Populist Message
Enli, G. (2025) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/19401612231221802 · Cited by 35
Schumann, S., Thomas, F., Ehrke, F., Bertlich, T., & Dupont, J. C. (2022) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2021.1907435 · Cited by 24
Carrella, F. (2020) · Brno studies in English · doi:10.5817/bse2020-2-1 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Ernst, N., Blassnig, S., Engesser, S., Büchel, F., & Esser, F.
- Venue
- Social Media + Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2056-3051 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2910401722
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 99.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Populists Prefer Social Media Over Talk Shows: An Analysis of Populist Messages and Stylistic Elements Across Six Countries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/2056305118823358
- The paper
- Ernst, N., Blassnig, S., Engesser, S., Büchel, F., & Esser, F. (2019). Populists Prefer Social Media Over Talk Shows: An Analysis of Populist Messages and Stylistic Elements Across Six Countries. Social Media + Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118823358
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.