CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 6

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Are anxiously attached dating app users less successful and feeling worse after use? The moderating role of perceived anonymity affordance

Hu, Junwen M., Thomas, Marina F.·2026·Information, Communication & Society
DOI 10.1080/1369118x.2025.2539294
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1369118x.2025.2539294

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 2
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 3
CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 1 Hypothesized model.
Figure 1 Hypothesized model.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 2 Results of moderated mediation analysis ( N = 381).
Figure 2 Results of moderated mediation analysis ( N = 381).CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 3 Perceived anonymity affordance attenuated the association between attachment anxiety and dating app success ( N = 381).
Figure 3 Perceived anonymity affordance attenuated the association between attachment anxiety and dating app success ( N = 381).CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. 10.1037/0003-066X.46.4.333 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.009 · DOI
  3. 10.1177/14614448241270542 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01304.x · DOI
  5. Chan, L. S. (2016). How sociocultural context matters in self-presentation: A comparison of U.S. and Chinese profiles on Jack’d, a mobile dating app for men who have sex with men. International Journal of Communication, 10(20), 6040–6059.
  6. 10.1177/2050157918770696 · DOI
  7. 10.1111/spc3.12808 · DOI
  8. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
  9. 10.1080/03637751.2017.1332418 · DOI
  10. 10.1080/00224545.2017.1389684 · DOI
  11. 10.1080/03637751.2017.1352100 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1080/1369118X.2020.1764606 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.chb.2024.108373 · DOI
  14. 10.1080/0144929X.2023.2201353 · DOI
  15. 10.1089/cyber.2025.0085 · DOI
  16. 10.5817/CP2023-4-2 · DOI
  17. 10.1080/10447318.2023.2217014 · DOI
  18. 10.1080/0144929X.2023.2299297 · DOI
  19. 10.1037/0003-066X.46.4.352 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1016/S0065-2601(00)80003-9 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1037/a0034532 · DOI
  22. Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2016). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
  23. 10.1080/14681994.2020.1714577 · DOI
  24. Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (7th ed.). Routledge.
  25. 10.1177/0963721417752106 · DOI
  26. 10.4324/9781315678610-22 · DOI
  27. 10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770698 · DOI
  28. 10.1111/jopy.12597 · DOI
  29. 10.1080/01494920903224350 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106977 · DOI
  31. 10.1177/14614448231161598 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.tele.2023.101949 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.028 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101331 · DOI
  35. 10.1037/pap0000123 · DOI
  36. 10.1177/009365096023001001 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.17077/48vt-m4t2 · DOI
  38. 10.1080/00223890701268041 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 6

Metadata

Authors
Hu, J. M., & Thomas, M. F.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University
  • Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences
ORCID
Venue
Information, Communication & Society
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2025-07-31
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
981-998
ISSN
  • 1369-118X
  • 1468-4462
DOI
10.1080/1369118x.2025.2539294
Cited by
6
References
2
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)
Funders
  • Zhuoyue Fellowship offered by the School of Journalism
  • Nanjing University

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review